The GMAN wrote:
spudone wrote:
The GMAN wrote:
I've done a fair bit of active shooter training. I'm not a SWAT guy or anything but I have far above average tactical sense and shooting ability. Nobody wants to go into an AR vs Pistol fight like this guy was facing but it's his job. He was certainly outgunned but he did have several things in his favor: - He's better trained than the kid
- He has the element of surprise as he pretty much knew where the kid was but the kid wouldn't know where he was
- He probably knew the layout of the school better, even though the kid was a former student
He didn't need to go running in there Leroy Jenkins style and add to the casualty list but there are ways to do it tactically and with purpose. You gotta go in. Kids are dying. If you do nothing more than hide around a corner and draw the shooter's attention... that's a big win at that moment. But you gotta go in.
Telling others not to go in is inexplicable. Especially when you now have the numbers.
I agree he should have tried to do something. But how did he know it was just one kid? Columbine was a pair; a single officer going in could've been surprised by the other shooter. It's easy to armchair quarterback after the fact, knowing exactly who was involved.
They did have intel, and relatively quickly from what I recall, that it was a single shooter. Did this SRO know that at the time? I don't know the timeline on that. Columbine was the only active school shooting that involved more than one shooter inside the school (that I can recall). I think two kids were involved in the Jonesboro, AR shooting, but they were shooting from outside the school. So one could play the odds it was a single shooter but I can understand the concern. Still need to go in.
Agreed. He should have gotten in the fight. This much seems pretty clear to me, but again; I wasn't there, don't know what he was thinking or seeing and this is all conjecture on my part. But still, this one is disquieting to say the least.
I'm also curious about the level of training he received once he moved into the SRO position. He's a sworn LEO, of course, but I have a cousin-in-law who is a Detroit Public Schools police officer (they have them here, mainly because they really, really need them) -- which is different from a school resources officer (though both are sworn LEOs). He says they're only required to attend two range training sessions annually with their service weapon (with one of those being an annual requal on a standard pistol course). He and several of his officers (he's a supervising sergeant now), though, go on their own more often, and also pay to attend regular shoot house training and other tactical training events offered by various ranges and instructors.
He says that many SROs, once they've spent time on the job, tend to let the law enforcement duties side of the house slide in favor of interacting more with the "kids." Apparently, in Broward, there was also a program that sought to decrease the number of law enforcement interactions students had, in an attempt to end what's being called the "school to prison pipeline." That may be why this shooter flew under the radar, so to speak, because there seems to be evidence that the SRO had knowledge of several incidents on school property in which the shooter was previously involved but didn't elevate them to official law enforcement actions for fear of saddling the shooter with a criminal record.
I concede, though, as several others have pointed out; this is a lot of armchair quarterbacking. But if we don't do a "lessons learned" on this tragedy, and take steps to fix the manifest issues with the system that have been revealed so far, we're likely to just see it repeated again.
"Politics is just show business for ugly people."