Stanford prof published his findings / conclusions in scientific journal. Other scientists dispute his findings. This is how it works, right?

Except this snowflake feels he can’t be disagreed with. So he takes his peers to court.

Now judges may have to decide if scientific conclusions are correct.

http://www.latimes.com/...-20171121-story.html

I think this may be uncharterd territory. It has potentially harmful long term repercussions.