jepvb wrote:
spot wrote:
jepvb wrote:
spot wrote:
windywave wrote:
spot wrote:
windywave wrote:
japarker24 wrote:
jepvb wrote:
You must be so proud. Proud? No. Just not naĂŻve enough to think (something like) this doesn't happen at all major D1 schools........... But it doesn't hence the rub It doesn't take much research to discover that there are a fair number of college athletes at many universities in this country with minimal reading skills. Certainly, something is going on at those colleges as well. While Google is top loaded with stories about UNC, dig a little in those articles and others and you'll find stories about plenty of other schools, even places like Creighton. He said ALL D1 schools do something like this, I disagree and could name at least D1 20 schools where the odds of it happening are low to nonexistent. And I would say you're pretty naive, if you think that there aren't any athletes at those 20 schools who have no business being there, and yet are passing their classes and graduating. So now you are calling schools who let in athletes "who have no business being there" cheaters on the same level as UNC? Priceless. Clearly you didn't read the previous post. Explain to me how someone who could barely read and or write and yet can still pass classes at a university, and even graduate. Happens at more universities than just UNC. Some other schools besides UNC bend the academic eligibility rules for student athletes - you don't say. This is different from saying that all other D1 schools do the same thing (or even a similar thing) to what UNC did. No, I don't think so. If you want to make a statement like that, you have to back it up. Don't site some articles on the internet that talk about shady academic tudoring, etc. at Creighton. UNC professors/employees created sham classes and then encouraged athletes to take those sham classes. This is UNC - supposedly one of the top academic schools in the country. Show me proof of this happening at Stanford, UVA, Michigan, et al. Being snarky with every post isn't really helping your argument. Just saying.
And, I'm pretty sure I said that Div 1 schools that are competitive for a national championship in football or basketball all have skeletons in their closet, not that they all do what Carolina did. If you don't think that many, if not most, big time Div 1 football or basketball programs are involved in some fairly rampant cheating when it comes to NCAA rules, then I think you're pretty naive.
Oh, and here are some remarks from the University of Michigan President Mark Schlissel:
Schlissel cited the recent North Carolina academic scandal of "no-show classes" as evidence of the problem in college athletics. He then pointed to U-M's football program, which has kept its Graduation Success Rate around 70%. The most recent data goes through the 2007 freshman class.
While that puts Michigan in the middle of the Big Ten pack, Schlissel compared it to the overall U-M student body, which he cited at nearly 90%.
"We admit students who aren't as qualified, and it's p
robably the kids that we admit that can't honestly, even with lots of help, do the amount of work and the quality of work it takes to make progression from year to year," he said, according to the Daily. "These past two years have gotten better, but before that, the graduation rates were terrible, with football somewhere in the 50s and 60s when our total six-year rate at the university is somewhere near 90%. So that's a challenge."
Then there was the U of M basketball scandal:
https://en.wikipedia.org/...n_basketball_scandal There are also a number of stories swirling around Jim Harbaugh and NCAA violations. There is also this, that talks about "clustering" at 18 universities: http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/news/ncaa-academic-reform-graduation-rates-clustering/1fe35zt78ufnz1pb9y5ipfdytp
___________________________________________________
Taco cat spelled backwards is....taco cat.