mortysct wrote:
As pointed out in the Facebook thread on the article she does not look like 0.19 cda. This pic is from a suboptimal angle but at least I would change a few things around to see if things would get faster.I am guessing the low CdA is mostly due to her being skinny. Those are some toothpick legs. What impresses me is how much potential she could have (assuming the eyeball windtunnel is even close to accurate). Aero socks and better shoe/pedal choice could be 6+ watts. Long sleeve skinsuit. A little more hip rotation and better hand placement. If 0.19 is correct, then 0.175 is a possibility.