Rod Thruster wrote:
Already covered. Basically an assault pistol is a semi-auto sporter rifle without a stock and scary looking. Not small enough to conceal and not practical enough to use for an actual assault.
It is basically a politically expedient term used to invoke irrational fear and political response.
I would much rather have a regular pistol or a regular semi-auto rifle. In my opinion, the only reason to own such a pistol would be to register it with the ATF, get a tax stamp, and slap a stock on it.
I have no clue why anyone would want one. Seriously. They suck and are completely impractical.
I also have no clue why an SBR requires a tax stamp. Before I lost them all in the flood, I has two SBRs. Fun little range guns and accurate enough for plinking, but not nearly as precise as a full-sized AR. They are LESS effective at actually hitting what you are aiming at. So, to restrict them is just stupid.
In that same vein, requiring a stamp for a suppressor is equally as asinine.
If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers
Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR