Have you not seen the footage of one of the terrorists......protesting in the UK park .....flying his ISIS flag?

What part did I embellish upon?

After the first travel ban was rejected Trump said that extreme vetting was already occurring in many places so now after four months what has happened?

Here are the tweets from the acting ambassador to the US Embassy in London (Trump hasn't nominated an ambassador to England yet). A little different from Trump's tone.

“It is with a heavy heart I offer my condolences and support to the people of the United Kingdom. America grieves with you,”
“The response from emergency services, law enforcement & officials in Ldn–as well as ordinary Londoners–has been extraordinary,”
“I commend the strong leadership of the @MayorofLondon as he leads the city forward after this heinous attack.”

I am not sure

When you see them shoot them in the head?

In terms of prevention. I think i saw somewhere a stat that estimated the lunatic fringe as 1% of 1% of the muslim population

I genuinely dont believe that muslims in east london, bradford, burnley or elsewhere are ambivalent or view these attacks as a victory

I also dont believe that its so pervasive that every muslim knows someone ready to strap on semtex

It appears in the last two weeks that people in their communities have informed on them and its still happened

That suggests that whilst there is obviously work to do in the muslim community, in these cases thats not where it has broken down

It will be interesting to see what impact, if any, the President's current tweets and statements about the "travel ban" will have on the outcome of court cases. He's openly insisting on calling it a ban, and criticizing the current proposal as not tough enough, which will certainly be used against him in arguments against the E.O. It's difficult for his lawyers to argue that it's not a ban, or that the President doesn't have intent to enact stricter controls when he is publicly stating what seems to be the opposite.

-
Maybe that is an estimate for the population in London or GB specifically, but what I've seen a number of times over the years is the radical portion of Muslims is 5 - 20%. In one of those "Intelligence Squared" debates, while arguing that there were not that many radical Muslims, Reza Azlan says this:
-
Reza Aslan, a fellow at the University of Southern California's Center on Public Diplomacy and a creative writing professor at the University of California, Riverside, says: "So then I suppose the real question here is why do we keep asking pundits and politicians and writers and public intellectuals what Muslims think? Why don't we just simply ask Muslims themselves? This is, after all, not so arduous a task. In fact, the Gallup organization — the most trusted polling organization in the world — has already done the work for us by conducting the largest, most comprehensive poll of the Muslim world ever done. According to that poll, a mere 7 percent of the world's Muslims — not Arabs — 7 percent of the world's Muslims believe that the attacks of 9/11 were justified. ... In fact, the Gallup poll found that in all Muslim countries, the majority of those Muslims who, quote/unquote, support violence or what we can refer to as radical views or tendencies do so for markedly secular — that is, political — reasons."
http://www.npr.org/...ominated-by-radicals
-
Those numbers of "radical" Muslims are the concern, but it's hard to find what the term specifically entail in the various polls/estimates.

Religion. In this case, the religion of Islam.

Prediction for this week: A daily Trump Tweet-Storm EVERY morning in the run-up to the Comey appearance before the committee on Thursday.

There is a historical pattern here, for Trump to create as much distraction and noise via Twitter, or by other means (controversial speeches) as he can prior to these types of events. The Comey testimony could be extraordinarily damning and damaging.

Or it could be very deflating for folks like you. Sad isn't it? How will some of you survive if Comey doesn't drop a political bomb? Will life go on? What happens when Rice, Power and Brennan testify under oath? Or will they take the 5th.

I'm amazed at how many liberals think they know what is coming. Good luck with that. Many of us have lived long enough to know, much of what you read and hear is bs but the truth will come out. And rarely is that truth what you want it to be or what you thought it was.

kinda' like how the multitudinous Benghazi investigations dispirited the Right.