Well that's a bizarre and confusing statistic table. 25 and under 55 to 64 and 45 to 54 and total. Where is the 25 to 44 age group? Does that mean no one from that age group or over 64 died on a motorcycle in Ontario between 2008-2014?
There are more riders in that age demographic ( in the US ) so I would expect there to be more fatalities.
"The median age of the typical motorcycle owner is 47, up from 32 in 1990 and 40 in 2009. And although its sales are slipping, Harley maintains a 55.1% share of the 35 and older male rider demographic. However, more troubling for the industry is the decline in riders under 18, which has fallen from 8% in 1990 to 2%, and those between 18 and 24 from 16% of the total down to 6%. Where will the new bike buyers come from if the industry is not attracting these younger people?"
There are more riders in that age demographic ( in the US ) so I would expect there to be more fatalities.
"The median age of the typical motorcycle owner is 47, up from 32 in 1990 and 40 in 2009. And although its sales are slipping, Harley maintains a 55.1% share of the 35 and older male rider demographic. However, more troubling for the industry is the decline in riders under 18, which has fallen from 8% in 1990 to 2%, and those between 18 and 24 from 16% of the total down to 6%. Where will the new bike buyers come from if the industry is not attracting these younger people?"