I'd chose the gov. of CT.

And yet she is still walking free. Really a disappointment in my book. Just another politician that can't follow through on their promises.

---

"The great pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do."

he can't. doing so could lead to his impeachment according to a handful of ex attorney generals.

---

who's smarter than you're? i'm!

Jesus Christ man. What is wrong with you? Did you even read your link? I got half way down when I saw Alan Dershowitz comment that it would be unwise. But nobody said it was impeachable. The ag should be independent of political pressure. But if you believe that you are stupid. An attorney general is selected based on being in line with the president. Sessions is the most critical ag of illegal immigration policies and sanctuary cities in decades. I don't even think trump would have to say anything for this to cross his mind.

But seriously. His is what the forth time in the last couple of months you cited evidence that didn't even say what you said it did. Or maybe I needed to read further down after people holder, Dershowitz, mulvaney, etc.

---

---

"In the world I see you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Towers. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying stripes of venison on the empty car pool lane of some abandoned superhighway." T Durden

Like I told JSA, federalism is the preferred avenue but since liberals pick and choose when it applies we who support it lose every time. So we're just playing the same game. Again, I would prefer reform, no wall, and only violent criminals going home. But the left created this monster and now want it both ways. That we cannot allow.

---

---

"In the world I see you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Towers. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying stripes of venison on the empty car pool lane of some abandoned superhighway." T Durden

lol, read it again. everyone in the article said things like: make him unfit, be illegal, no precedent, be grounds to demand a resignation, be an impechable offense



i think you are confusing me with someone else.

---

who's smarter than you're? i'm!

Boss...this is a pretty hilarious statement. You're accusing politicians from political pandering with the argument that [they] are putting American lives in danger. Sounds an awful lot like you're pandering yourself with the oh-so-popular approach of fear mongering. American lives in danger? Puh-lease! There's 300 million people in this country. Of course there are some bad hombres out there and I'm sure you could link a half dozen articles in which a(n) (illegal) bad hombre raped a nice white American girl.

But let's not pretend that what you did there is the same low form of pandering that you're accusing the other side of. Illegal immigration does not equal American lives in danger. If you want to solve the illegal immigration problem let's talk about the big problems with it - not cherrypicked sensationalism to scare the populace to agree to another shitty "plan" like building an idiotic and expensive wall. Or are you saying that protecting American lives is the important part? Because I have a lot of proposals to address that problem. Let's see...guns, healthcare...you probably won't like my ideas there ;). Judging from our leadership's rhetoric and recent actions the "American lives" argument only comes out when it's convenient, not necessarily when it makes sense.

Back from that tangent - I have no issues with the Feds applying pressure on sanctuary cities. I'd prefer if they followed existing laws too - both sides for that matter. Ideally, we'd actually focus on the issues instead of scoring points. Saying that Democrats fucked up the system beyond repair is a cop-out. We've had a broken immigration system for decades. If your answer to why the solution is a nonsensical wall and aggressive deportation that disregards the human cost is "Democrats broke the system" then my reaction is - your party has no good ideas of their own and can't govern effectively (note, I'm saying nothing about my party - they too are weak).

The list of states with legal pot is growing every year. You want to arrest their governors too?

no, he wants to buy some.....from california.

---

who's smarter than you're? i'm!

They could and unfortunately it is much more likely to happen under this legislation. But politically not likely. Crosses red and blue states.

---

---

"In the world I see you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Towers. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying stripes of venison on the empty car pool lane of some abandoned superhighway." T Durden

Since we aren't allowing the door to swing both ways, I thought the Rebubs were all about giving power back to the cities and states.

I don't think so. On both points. Use that superior intellect you think you have. Halfway through I didn't see one mention of impeachable. I did see should resign. But should resign vs illegal or impeachable are not the same thing.

On the other point. As pointed out, you don't often even cite evidence. A few weeks back when pressed you linked an article you admitted to not reading. Jose of us who did pointed out it didn't support the argument at hand. That wasn't the first time as pointed out to you. This is a habit. If your goal is to derail my thread let's talk about your pathological problem with this.

---

---

"In the world I see you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Towers. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying stripes of venison on the empty car pool lane of some abandoned superhighway." T Durden

Having an opposing opinion does not derail a thread..

You beat me to it. It seems another nut job is finding his legs on the LR. Two days ago it was i04 and yesterday it was xtremrun. Dan is breeding a lot of 'em these days.

I am not "full time resident" of this forum so I do not know enough about you, TheForge, but seems you are not a New Yorker. DeBlasio, independently of political theather performance that I assumed shaped your perception, is deeply embedded into real estate interests in NYC. He will be the last arrest ever initiated by WH since it would severely negatively affect business and developmental opportunnities of Trump Organization and Kushner Companies. And real estate in NYC is like sex and drugs for the most of America... too important to be affected even by politics or emotions. This is why cognitive dissonance is totally functional concept in NYC. Also, where are you?

My father lives there. And he loves this clown. But you are right, it isn't likely. Or if it happens, it will be in a token town where there are several bad hombres that can justify the disturbance to the status quo.

---

---

"In the world I see you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Towers. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying stripes of venison on the empty car pool lane of some abandoned superhighway." T Durden

No, but introducing unrelated info and articles that don't even support your statement do.

---

---

"In the world I see you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Towers. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying stripes of venison on the empty car pool lane of some abandoned superhighway." T Durden

If you don't want people to comment on the title of your thread then don't put a title there.

---

who's smarter than you're? i'm!

funny that yup would miss this then...

"while carrying out such a threat would constitute an "impeachable offense.""

when others talk about it being illegal, guess what can happen after a president does something illegal.....



You're definitely misremembering something but you can prove that you're not by citing it. show me how its done.

---

who's smarter than you're? i'm!

Why do they even need to do that? They are already here illegally and by existing law are supposed to be deported. Why do we need even more laws to enforce laws that are already on the books? The only thing that needs to be changed is for people in ICE to be told to do their damned jobs.

The first and only example of Impeach I saw was this.

Trump's campaign manager Kellyanne Conway tried to downplay Trump's threat, later saying it was just "a quip." However, some prominent lawyers and legal scholars took umbrage at the threat and expressed alarm. Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe told Fortune that even threatening such a thing was "incompatible with the survival of a stable constitutional republic," while carrying out such a threat would constitute an "impeachable offense."

Here is his complete quote.

Making threats or vows to use a nation's criminal justice system against one's vanquished political opponent is worse than terrible policy: it's incompatible with the survival of a stable constitutional republic and, under our Constitution, would represent an abuse of power so grave that it would be an impeachable offense—one reminiscent of Richard Nixon's deliberate use of the IRS to go after his political enemies."

This was specific to a threat to do it. Not the example I had. The threat and acting on it would be impeachable. Not the legitimate concern of a law broken and asking the justice dept to investigate.

The term doesn't come up anywhere else in the post.

Point two. Interestingly in the thread I was thinking of, I conflated the OP doing what I accused you of doing. Never fear, I found others.

http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=6250887#p6250887

This one to. You can back page the numerous back and forth where you give no citation to support your "scientific opinion". But the last line in this post reminds me of what I really need to do with you and am going to after this. Ignore your little spin machine where you try to make yourself look smart.

http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=6249902#p6249902

http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=5871137#p5871137

http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=5805808#p5805808 - Granted, this one is between you and Guru, that argument basically plays out with neither side winning, since neither of you are really good at presenting your argument with supporting facts.

---

---

"In the world I see you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Towers. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying stripes of venison on the empty car pool lane of some abandoned superhighway." T Durden

great, you found examples of me REJECTING other peoples claims. that doesn't require me citing evidence. you have it backwards. ironically, in that abortion thread. the page you linked to is me asking vitus to support his claim. a claim that he has asserted and refused to back up for 2 years. mjuric called him on the same exact claim in 2015.
but youll probabaly keep making the same incorrect accusation against me and ignore when others actually do it.

---

who's smarter than you're? i'm!