Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

The GOP caught with its pants down again.
Quote | Reply
How did we miss this?


A birther and member of Donald Trump’s leadership team in Oklahoma is under investigation after police say he was found with an underage teenage boy in a motel room.
"State Senator Ralph Shortey, 35, who represents Oklahoma City, was found with a teenage boy in a motel in the town of Moore on the night of March 9, police say. Shortey is facing three charges: soliciting prostitution of a minor, prostitution within 1,000 feet of a church and transportation for the purposes of prostitution. A vote was taken on March 15 in the Oklahoma Senate that removed practically all of Shortey’s privileges."
http://heavy.com/...shortey-teenage-boy/

"The great pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do."
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [jkca1] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
prostitution within 1,000 feet of a church

wtf?

who's smarter than you're? i'm!
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [veganerd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
veganerd wrote:
Quote:
prostitution within 1,000 feet of a church


wtf?

Obviously an effort to prevent Baptist ministers from moonlighting.
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [jkca1] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
And his name is Shortey?
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [veganerd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
veganerd wrote:
Quote:
prostitution within 1,000 feet of a church

wtf?

Yeah, wtf?

Civilize the mind, but make savage the body.

- Chinese proverb
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [jkca1] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
He was quoted at the time as saying, “I think leadership needs to be bottom-up.”

Interdasting...

Civilize the mind, but make savage the body.

- Chinese proverb
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [veganerd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
veganerd wrote:
Quote:
prostitution within 1,000 feet of a church


wtf?

My state (whole country, really, but state laws differ slightly) has very liberal prostitution laws, only prohibiting the nastier concomitants (pimping, procuring, child prostitution, not divulging a scheduled STI etc).

Among the restrictions is street soliciting for prostitution near or within view of a dwelling, school, church or hospital. "Streetwalkers" are almost extinct; they mostly work from homes or small brothels. You also may not solicit in a school, church or hospital. Wowsers.
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [jkca1] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Hope you get over the election butthurt soon, it is giving you tunnel vision. Democratic lawmakers have a long history of abuse and are well known for it.

REP. JOHN YOUNG (D-Tex.):
Colleen Gardner, a former staff secretary to Young, told the New York Times that Young increased her salary after she gave in to his sexual advances. In November, Young, who had run unopposed in the safe Democratic district five consecutive times, w More..as reelected with just 61 percent of the vote. The scandal wouldn’t go away, and in 1978 Young was defeated in a Democratic primary runoff.
REP. ALLAN HOWE (D-Utah):
Howe was arrested in Salt Lake City on charges of soliciting two policewomen posing as prostitutes. Howe insisted he was set up and refused to resign. But the Democratic Party distanced itself from his candidacy and he was trounced by his Republican opponent in the November election.
REP. FRED RICHMOND (D-N.Y.):
Richmond was arrested in Washington for soliciting sex from a 16-year-old boy. Richmond apologized for his actions, conceding he “made bad judgments involving my private life.” In spite of a Democratic primary opponent’s attempts to cash in on the headlines, Richmond easily won renomination and reelection. But his career came to an end four years later when, after pleading guilty to possession of marijuana and tax evasion – and amid allegations that he had his staff procure cocaine for him — he resigned his seat.
REP. JOHN HINSON (D-Miss.):
During his first reelection bid, Hinson stunned everyone by announcing that in 1976 he had been accused of committing an obscene act at a gay haunt in Virginia. Hinson, married and a strong conservative, added that in 1977 he had survived a fire in a gay D.C. movie theater. He was making the disclosure, he said, because he needed to clear his conscience. But he denied he was a homosexual and refused GOP demands that he resign. Hinson won reelection in a three-way race, with 39 percent of the vote. But three months later, he was arrested on charges of attempted oral sodomy in the restroom of a House office building. He resigned his seat on April 13, 1981.
REP. ROBERT BAUMAN (D-Md.):
Bauman, a leading “pro-family” conservative, pleaded innocent to a charge that he committed oral sodomy on a teenage boy in Washington. Married and the father of four, Bauman conceded that he had been an alcoholic but had been seeking treatment. The news came as a shock to voters of the rural, conservative district, and he lost to a Democrat in November.
REP. DAN CRANE (R-Ill.) and REP. GERRY STUDDS (D-Mass.):
The House ethics committee on July 14, 1983, announced that Crane and Studds had sexual relationships with teenage congressional pages — Crane with a 17-year-old female in 1980, Studds with a 17-year-old male in 1973. Both admitted the charges that same day, and Studds acknowledged he was gay. The committee voted to reprimand the two, but a back-bench Georgia Republican named Newt Gingrich argued that they should be expelled. The full House voted on July 20 instead to censure the two, the first time that ever happened for sexual misconduct. Crane, married and the father of six, was tearful in his apology to the House, while Studds refused to apologize. Crane’s conservative district voted him out in 1984, while the voters in Studds’s more liberal district were more forgiving. Studds won reelection in 1984 with 56 percent of the vote, and continued to win until he retired in 1996.
SEN. BROCK ADAMS (D-Wash.):
Seattle newspapers reported that Kari Tupper, the daughter of Adams’s longtime friends, filed a complaint against the Washington Democrat in July of 1987, charging sexual assault. She claimed she went to Adams’s house in March 1987 to get him to end a pattern of harassment, but that he drugged her and assaulted her. Adams denied any sexual assault, saying they only talked about her employment opportunities. Adams continued raising campaign funds and declared for a second term in February of 1992. But two weeks later the Seattle Times reported that eight other women were accusing Adams of sexual molestation over the past 20 years, describing a history of drugging and subsequent rape. Later that day, while still proclaiming his innocence, Adams ended his campaign.
REP. JIM BATES (D-Calif.):
Roll Call quoted former Bates aides in October 1988 saying that the San Diego Democrat made sexual advances toward female staffers. Bates called it a GOP-inspired smear campaign, but also apologized for anything he did that might have seemed inappropriate. The story came too close to Election Day to damage Bates, who won easily. However, the following October the ethics committee sent Bates a “letter of reproval” directing him to make a formal apology to the women who filed the complaint. Although the district was not thought to be hospitable to the GOP, Randy “Duke” Cunningham, a former Navy pilot who was once shot down over North Vietnam, ousted Bates in 1990 by fewer than 2,000 votes.
REP. GUS SAVAGE (D-Ill.):
Savage had fondled a Peace Corps volunteer while on an official visit to Zaire. Savage called the story a lie and blamed it on his political enemies and a racist media. (Savage is black.) In January 1990, the House ethics committee decided that the events did occur, but decided against any disciplinary action because Savage wrote a letter to the woman saying he “never intended to offend” her. Savage was reelected in 1990, but finally ousted in the 1992 primary by Mel Reynolds.
REP. BARNEY FRANK (D-Mass.):
In response to a story in the Washington Times, Frank confirmed that he hired Steve Gobie, a male prostitute, in 1985 to live with and work for him in his D.C. apartment. But Frank, who is gay, said he fired Gobie in 1987 when he learned he was using the apartment to run a prostitution service. The Boston Globe, among others, called on Frank to resign, but he refused. On July 19, 1990, the ethics committee recommended Frank be reprimanded because he “reflected discredit upon the House” by using his congressional office to fix 33 of Gobie’s parking tickets. Attempts to expel or censure Frank failed; instead the House voted 408-18 to reprimand him. The fury in Washington was not shared in Frank’s district, where he won reelection in 1990 with 66 percent of the vote, and has won by larger margins ever since.
SEN. DANIEL INOUYE (D-Hawaii):
In October 1992, Republican Senate nominee Rick Reed began running a campaign commercial that included a surreptitiously taped interview with Lenore Kwock, Inouye’s hairdresser. Kwock said Inouye had sexually forced himself on her in 1975 and continued a pattern of sexual harassment, even as Kwock continued to cut his hair over the years. Inouye, seeking a sixth term, denied the charges. And Kwock said that by running the commercial, Reed had caused her more pain than Inouye had. Reed was forced to pull the ad, and while many voters took out their anger on the Republican, Inouye was held to 57 percent of the vote – the lowest total of his career. A week later, a female Democratic state legislator announced that she had heard from nine other women who claimed Inouye had sexually harassed them over the past decade. But the women didn’t go public with their claims, the local press didn’t pursue the story, and the Senate Ethics Committee decided to drop the investigation because the accusers wouldn’t participate in an inquiry.
REP MEL REYNOLDS (D-Ill.):
Freshman Reynolds was indicted on Aug. 19, 1994, on charges of having sex with a 16-year-old campaign worker and then pressuring her to lie about it. Reynolds, who is black, denied the charges and said the investigation was racially motivated. The GOP belatedly put up a write-in candidate for November, but Reynolds dispatched him in the overwhelmingly Democratic district with little effort. Reynolds was convicted on Aug. 22, 1995 of 12 counts of sexual assault, obstruction of justice and solicitation of child pornography, was sentenced to five years in prison, and resigned his seat on October 1.

If you are a Canuck that engages in gratuitous bashing of the US, you are probably on my Iggy List. So, save your self a bunch of typing a response unless you also feel the need to gratuitously bash me. If so, have fun.
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f___ things up" - Barack Obama, 2020
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [jkca1] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkca1 wrote:
How did we miss this?

We? You're the one who's on a OP streak the past two days.
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [gregtryin] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
gregtryin wrote:
Hope you get over the election butthurt soon, it is giving you tunnel vision. Democratic lawmakers have a long history of abuse and are well known for it.

Got it, so since Democrats have done stupid shit to it's okay for this Republican. At least before you freak out and say, but the Democrats, you could have at least said, "I don't condone his actions, but....."

_____
TEAM HD
Each day is what you make of it so make it the best day possible.
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [gregtryin] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Oh what a fun game. I can play too.

This guy thinks it is actually 10:1 ratio of Republicans getting caught compared to Democrats.
https://patrick.net/...ompared+to+Democrats


Or this one saying more Republicans have been caught than transgenders.
http://www.patheos.com/...s-than-trans-people/

Interesting that you don't condemn these vile acts.
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [crowny2] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
It generally seems to me that (with obvious exceptions of course) republicans get in trouble with sex, and democrats get in trouble with money. I guess people secretly lust after what is publicly taboo in their lives.
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [Old Hickory] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Old Hickory wrote:
jkca1 wrote:
How did we miss this?


We? You're the one who's on a OP streak the past two days.

Yeah but his name was Shortey...Still cracking me up.

"The great pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do."
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [crowny2] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have to give credit where credit is due. You, Tyrod, jkca, etc. are dedicated. Hilarious, but dedicated.

When I see another one of jkca's threads, it is always entertaining.

Greg

If you are a Canuck that engages in gratuitous bashing of the US, you are probably on my Iggy List. So, save your self a bunch of typing a response unless you also feel the need to gratuitously bash me. If so, have fun.
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f___ things up" - Barack Obama, 2020
Quote Reply
Re: The GOP caught with its pants down again. [markea] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
markea wrote:
It generally seems to me that (with obvious exceptions of course) republicans get in trouble with sex, and democrats get in trouble with money. I guess people secretly lust after what is publicly taboo in their lives.

The part that gets the R's into trouble above all, is when they get caught w/ the ghey treats after all the foot-stomping and hand-wringing to fight for the sanctity of their official hetero-only agenda. Nobody is saying it's OK to cheat on your wife or hire a pro, but there's not the same level of outrage or schadenfreude about it either since just about anyone who's ever been married for a long time can empathize a little with wanting to hit some fresh strange; it's the closeted cock queens who are outwardly vocal homophobes that invite the loudest charges of hypocrisy.

Basically, hardly any of us would care if they weren't trying to claim a monopoly on virtue in the first place, railing against all those immoral 'Hollywood liberals' and so forth... I can forgive simple weaknesses of the flesh (including guy/guy) well enough as long as both sides were willing participants, just spare us the fake pious BS.
Quote Reply