Hello All,
https://pvcycling.wordpress.com/...cense-in-ca-part-ii/
People v. McKay goes into detail about what constitutes satisfactory ID, and two of the main requirements appear to be:
1. Must be documentary
2. Must, in addition to other identifying information, include a current address
http://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/4th/27/601.html.
People v. McKay specifically cites to 12591 as proof that the legislature intended users of the roadway to carry ID. This is a bicycle case about a bicyclist who was arrested for a municipal bicycling infraction because he did not have satisfactory ID even though he gave his name and address, which were accurate.
Cheers, Neal
+1 mph Faster
https://pvcycling.wordpress.com/...cense-in-ca-part-ii/
People v. McKay goes into detail about what constitutes satisfactory ID, and two of the main requirements appear to be:
1. Must be documentary
2. Must, in addition to other identifying information, include a current address
http://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/4th/27/601.html.
People v. McKay specifically cites to 12591 as proof that the legislature intended users of the roadway to carry ID. This is a bicycle case about a bicyclist who was arrested for a municipal bicycling infraction because he did not have satisfactory ID even though he gave his name and address, which were accurate.
Cheers, Neal
+1 mph Faster