They could be and likely would be but I'm not sure if that should really be the goal. If you "push the button" it's going to be a bad day. If anything, dirty warheads lend more gravity to the decision. It's part of the idea behind New START banning MIRVs*: the nature of MIRVs made that portion of the triad highly concentrated (lose 100 missiles to a strike and you've lost 400-1200 warheads) and thus the incentive in a heated situation was to push the button first. Limiting ICBMs to one warhead distributes the inventory of warheads thus making it less likely to lose a whole portion of one's triad in one strike thus making one less inclined to strike first.
*MIRVs are still allowed for land based ICBMs so long as the other re-entry vehicles are decoys. It was basically a gentlemen's agreement saying "hey this practice could turn MAD on its head in a bad way, let's both avoid doing that" and both parties saw the logic and agreed. MIRVs are still allowed, and used on, SLBMs as they are considered relatively invulnerable to a first-strike.
*MIRVs are still allowed for land based ICBMs so long as the other re-entry vehicles are decoys. It was basically a gentlemen's agreement saying "hey this practice could turn MAD on its head in a bad way, let's both avoid doing that" and both parties saw the logic and agreed. MIRVs are still allowed, and used on, SLBMs as they are considered relatively invulnerable to a first-strike.