In lieu of hiding the whole EW90-B junction box in the stem (few options) I'm thinking I could do the following:
both sets of shifters to one JC41 each (hidden in each extension bar), then one wire from each into the bike where the EW-90B is hidden. rest of system remains as 'standard' installation. Basically i'm just removing/consolidating the number of inputs into the EW90-B junction box. This would then give me only two wires to bundle (say w/ shrink tubing) with the rear brake cable back into the frame which is way better than the 5 cables and 5 port box i've got hanging out around my stem now....
Got the idea here
http://forumdev.slowtwitch.com/forum/Slowtwitch_Forums_C1/Triathlon_Forum_F1/Di2_Junction_Box_question_5_port_same_as_3_port%3F_P5759477/
Possible? Tested? Total shit idea?
________________________________________________________
Taylor Rogers
2024: IM Hamburg
both sets of shifters to one JC41 each (hidden in each extension bar), then one wire from each into the bike where the EW-90B is hidden. rest of system remains as 'standard' installation. Basically i'm just removing/consolidating the number of inputs into the EW90-B junction box. This would then give me only two wires to bundle (say w/ shrink tubing) with the rear brake cable back into the frame which is way better than the 5 cables and 5 port box i've got hanging out around my stem now....
Got the idea here
http://forumdev.slowtwitch.com/forum/Slowtwitch_Forums_C1/Triathlon_Forum_F1/Di2_Junction_Box_question_5_port_same_as_3_port%3F_P5759477/
Possible? Tested? Total shit idea?
________________________________________________________
Taylor Rogers
2024: IM Hamburg