veganerd wrote:
JSA wrote:
veganerd wrote:
JSA wrote:
veganerd wrote:
JSA wrote:
veganerd wrote:
JSA wrote:
veganerd wrote:
can you tell me what we are seeing differently? what i meant? clearly, you cannot, if you think it was off topic.
I think you are so far lost in the weeds that neither you nor I can tell what you "meant."
you feel most republicans are not defending him correct?
Defending what? His official actions in office? Nothing to defend. His personal conduct? No, "most" republicans are not "defending" his personal conduct.
you and i are seeing different things.
Ok. Show me ANYTHING that suggests that "most" republicans are "defending" his personal conduct.
show me where most arent. you made the claim. i just disagreed with you. i disagreed with you based on what ive seen and heard. i just said we are seeing different things, why are you struggling with this?
No, kiddo. You made the claim and you did so through your insanely biased glasses. You made the claim when no one made a claim to the contrary. Thus, you bear the burden.
We are seeing different things. The fact that we have a disagreement is evidence of that. It's a simple observation that you and I are seeing different things. It may be due to our cognitive biases. I'm not disputing that. I'm simply pointing out that we are seeing different things. You either agree with that assessment or you do not. The fact that you're arguing with me about it shows that we are in disagreement on what we see.
Veganerd, I know you think you are scoring internet points by backing JSA into a logic corner for-the-win on some point that only you now what is, but no one knows WTF you are talking about.
Just a random comment from a bystander.
.