slowguy wrote:
spot wrote:
slowguy wrote:
gphin305 wrote:
slowguy wrote:
TheForge wrote:
Well if they have such important skills I'm sure they will find jobs. And the economy will be better off.
But of course, that's not how the economy works. They mentioned reducing federal civilian workforce by ~10%. That's more than 250,000 people losing their jobs. Mr. Trump just made a huge deal about saving 1000. You think there are 250,000 jobs just sitting empty waiting for people?
There are definitely places to cut waste in the federal government, and the workforce is one of them. However, the federal civilian workforce is not out of proportion to where it's been for 50 years. The number of federal civilian employees is consistent with where it's been all of this century, and less than it was during the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s. Moving too fast is a recipe for disaster.
The only problem with this rationale is technology has made workers much more efficient over the past 20 years especially in the private sector. The same amount of productivity can be accomplished with less employees.....or more productivity from the same amount of employees.....in the private sector. These employees need to perform or they are out. Way too many federal employees (as well as state) could give a crap about their productivity. You could easily cut at least 10% of the federal civilian workforce (the dead weight) and still maintain the same amount of productivity.
Maybe. From a different perspective, I've heard time and again how the military can do all the things we're doing with fewer people. I've seen manning go down on ships, and those crews simply unable to do the things asked of them, or able to do them at significant sacrifice in terms of life-work balance over and above what we already expect from military families. People outside the organization frequently think more or the same can be done "easily" with fewer people. It's not always true.
Anyway, I think there's danger in trying to make the direct comparison to civilian sector employees. The jobs aren't the same, the end goal isn't the same, the laws aren't the same, etc, etc. It's difficult to draw an apples to apples comparison.
I completely agree with you when it comes to military manning. But, when it comes to government civilian manning doing essentially office jobs, I think there is a lot of areas where fewer people would actually be more efficient. Take acquisition...every time I see talk about acquisition reform, they talk about adding more people to the process. But in my opinion, adding more people just slows contractors down and adds more meetings, more reviews, more time having engineers billing $200 an hour building powerpoint slides for government civilians who have never built a damn thing in their lives. Our acquisition process would get better with fewer, more talented people, not more.
One of the problems at hand is lumping all federal civilians together. Maybe Defense acquisitions could afford to lose 10% or its personnel or even more, along with some streamlined procedures. Maybe Dept of Interior is strapped for people and needs to actually increase numbers. Maybe DoS could reasonably accept 5% decrease. Etc. All federal jobs aren't equal. I've worked at places where the civilians traveled non-stop, and worked hard, and they would have given their left nuts for 5 additional qualified bodies. I'm sure there are other places where you mostly have people shuffling paperwork and putting in time to retirement.
Despite Forge's certainty that federal workers are the devil, this problem actually requires a bit more thought than to just insist the system is broken and we should chop 10% from the workforce. That approach didn't make sense with budgets during sequestration, and it doesn't make sense here either.
Yes, don't disagree. I should be more specific when I say my experience is with DoD civilians. That being said, I would not be at all surprised if there were similar issues with other federal agencies.
___________________________________________________
Taco cat spelled backwards is....taco cat.