Quote:
AMGEN has the power/moneys to make their product detectable and made the deliberate decision to just 'donate' a little fraction of their profits to develop better tests (more a publicity stunt than anything). I guess it is all about who makes the money (share holders).
No affiliation with either company, and would not consider to hold stock/work for each of them in any form or function.
You obviously do not understand how a drug gets FDA approval. It's not as easy as sticking a marker in the drug for testing purposes unless you've not gotten approval already. To get approval for a modification like that will cost minimal $50MM.
You also don't understand how athletes get drugs or how drugs get to patients. They can't just roll up to Amgen HQ and grab a few vials, they need a prescription or need to obtain it illegally. Amgen is 2-3-4-5 steps removed from that process. There is a wholesaler, a PBM, insurance company, a pharmacy plus a physician or 2-3 or more of those between when a drug leaves a company and when an actual patient receives the drug. The healthcare drug delivery system is more effed up than you realize but now we are getting into LR territory.
I have no affiliation with Amgen other than I've been to the mothership (home office) for interviews only to turn them down 2x for pharma jobs well and I hold a few hundred shares of stock. I did spend 12 years in pharma though.
So to vilify Amgen or any pharma company for 1 drug they produce is short sighted when most companies are in multiple disease states. Especially when the abuse of the drugs happens not bc the company produces it but bc people in the healthcare chain and patients are willing to use it off label (which is legal), use it illegally etc.
I understand your anger at dopers, believe me I do as Iv'e got both pro's and age groupers that most likely have had results and their income negatively impacted by drugs. Your anger is misdirected in this case.
Brian Stover USAT LII
Accelerate3 Coaching
Insta