sphere wrote:
If you read through the thread (I don't recommend it) you'll see I was highly critical of him, for multiple reasons.
He reminds me of a college kid who gets spun up on social justice issues without having the historical background squared away in context. I think he's going through the same process many young people do, who feel obligated by position or ethnic pressures, except he's doing it in the public spotlight.
I can't fault him for rethinking his approach to protest, and taking a knee rather than sitting. It shows respect while maintaining a protest position. He's made his point, drawn the media's attention, and is now going about putting his money and time where his mouth was.
There's hope for everyone. I'll presume his good intentions until proven otherwise, his ahistorical missteps notwithstanding.
Beyond Colin Kaepernick what surprised me about this entire incident was how liberal sports writers as a group had become. Most of the people I listened to couldn't even articulate logical objections CK's behavior -- so, of course, they acted like logical objections didn't exist.
I found listening to the usually vanilla Mike and Mike the most unexpected. They basically agreed with what CK was doing, and, as the cherry on top, we got to see Greenberg do his "I'm just a dumb white person" shtick just like he does his "I'm just an idiot man or idiot husband" shtick. Those shticks are fine for humorously dealing with his foibles with his wife or why he's a bad athlete or a clutz or whatever. Race relations are another matter. It was just distasteful.
Another thing I found concerning was on one of those sport shows -- I forget which now -- they asked CK if he saw any positive results from his protests. He said, yes, he did see positive results. He cited kids in high school also taking a knee during their sports contests to protest. Really? That's the positive result? Great! The irony totally went over the head of the host.