I think it is as simple as there is a law against showing dildos in public, but openly displaying a loaded firearm is acceptable.
Are they then fighting for their "Right" to openly carry dildo's? Is this even a thing, a concern of anyone's?
Some people find guns and the display of guns to be objectionable, but do not find sex toys to be offensive. I believe the protestors are trying to point out the absurdity of the two laws.
But the statement is "Cocks not Glocks" and they are running around with dildos. I get the absurdity of it, but I highly doubt anyone is angling for the right to walk around with a dildo openly displayed. So "Cocks not glocks" is not really the slogan they are looking for.
"Boobs not Berrettas" could have been used as some want the right to walk around topless, this makes sense. I don't see a big push for people walking around with their dildos and cocks hanging out.
~Matt
Are they then fighting for their "Right" to openly carry dildo's? Is this even a thing, a concern of anyone's?
Some people find guns and the display of guns to be objectionable, but do not find sex toys to be offensive. I believe the protestors are trying to point out the absurdity of the two laws.
But the statement is "Cocks not Glocks" and they are running around with dildos. I get the absurdity of it, but I highly doubt anyone is angling for the right to walk around with a dildo openly displayed. So "Cocks not glocks" is not really the slogan they are looking for.
"Boobs not Berrettas" could have been used as some want the right to walk around topless, this makes sense. I don't see a big push for people walking around with their dildos and cocks hanging out.
~Matt