I think this younger generation grew up saturated with sex on TV and porn that they are a lot more open to the idea of polyamorous relationships. Not a bad thing.

---

---

"In the world I see you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Towers. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying stripes of venison on the empty car pool lane of some abandoned superhighway." T Durden

What about the glasses she used (aka google glasses) to read answers to Congress?

If I'm cheating, then I'm OK with it. If you're cheating then I'm not.

As to the link, what makes you think Clinton would be the only one using that technology?

I think we watched two different videos.

I didn't watch the video. Just answered the question.

---

---

"In the world I see you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Towers. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying stripes of venison on the empty car pool lane of some abandoned superhighway." T Durden

Oh. I thought this was a sex thread.

---

---

"In the world I see you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Towers. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying stripes of venison on the empty car pool lane of some abandoned superhighway." T Durden

Cheating has always been seen by the cheater as being acceptable as long as you don't get caught.

The difference now is that more people are getting caught.

That low-res image is fairly pixelated. I cannot stand Hillary, but let's be honest, the picture is no evidence of her use of Google glasses to help her through a Congressional hearing. It looks like reflection in the lens. If there is an image on the lens, from where is it possibly being cast into her field of vision? There are plenty of legitimate reasons to criticize her, but these stupid conspiracy ideas just detract from them.

Really weird...people are strange.

re: cheating, it depends on who's doing the cheating. Wife or husband: bad, depending on how much they love each other. Athlete: bad, unless it's football then it's probably good and no one cares (unless it's insignificant PSI in footballs then it's a national crisis). If it's baseball it's automatically the biggest story ever, because baseball fans are the worst (I'm one of them, but can't stand the 'old guard'). Politician: mixed, it's bad but also expected, so it only really ever matters if the pol in question is an R or D and then it only matters to the media aligned with the other side. Car racing: if you ain't cheating you ain't trying. Triathlon: depends, are you using fins or drafting (bad), or are you 'buying' speed with the most expensive, high-tech aero gear that costs as much as a car (good).

My take: cheating is bad, but expected, and will be most prevalent in the areas that generate the most money (high-grossing sports, Wall Street) or power (politicians). Cheaters are either understandable (when the real outcome is someone winning/losing a sports match/game, and most everyone is doing it), bad (systemic cheating like Lance Armstrong, Russian oly team, wife/husband) or reprehensible (politicians, Wall Street; when the impacts are felt beyond the arena, in peoples lives and pocketbooks).

If Hillary is that sophisticated and her and Bill have offed as many people as 'some people' say they have, then isn't she exactly the kind of person we need in charge during these trying and dangerous times? Do you really want a guy in a trucker hat with tiny tiny hands?

---

I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.

Honestly? That was a joke. Same as the OP, I hope. Hillary is indeed as crooked as a dog's hind leg but she's not sophisticated enough to use email much less the ear or eye technologies

This documentary video shows how difficult this form of cheating can be...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRAk6YWmrlQ

It's clear that Trump is the more likely candidate to be using this kind of technology. He speaks way too eloquently and thoughtfully to just be making it up on the fly.

Sorry for misunderstanding the joke. To be fair, there's plenty of Breitbart-esque crazy in the LR for it to be perfectly reasonable to assume it was a serious reply.

Is he Steven Hawking's voice double?

---

Suffer Well.

I announce my candidacy for the Libertarian Party nomination for President of the United States. Now here's my promise to you; if elected as your President, I will take office on January 20, 2013 – .. I promise that on that day, I will do three things … – Still2012.com


.. The government must work for the people.

http://www.thedailybell.com/...-runs-for-president/