Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: Is this "Pretty girl privilege"? [champy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
champy wrote:
From what I understand, she accidentally sent it to her Snapchat Story so anyone that was following her could see instead of to an individual person she had meant. Whether you believe that or not.

Regardless, taking the pictures was not an accident. Just an awful person.

Being a cunt wasn't an accident either, and gives pretty good insight into her and her friend.
Quote Reply
Re: Is this "Pretty girl privilege"? [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
j p o wrote:
I don't know, the voyeur laws are going to differ from state to state. Taking a naked picture of someone in a locker room and posting it online will violate the law in a lot of places. Intent is saying "I want to break the law' it is, 'I took these actions intentionally and not by accident.' As in, if she had taken a selfie of herself and someone inadvertently walked behind her.

She isn't privileged as much as a straight up bitch.

California Penal Code 647.j.3?

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/...0&file=639-653.2

Or, the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2004?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1801

clm
Nashville, TN
https://twitter.com/ironclm | http://ironclm.typepad.com
Quote Reply

Prev Next