BLeP wrote:
chainpin wrote:
Yeah that is pretty sad.
Ballwashers these liberal 'judges' or whatever you want to call them.
All gor the cause.
Separation of powers has no meaning to them unless it suits their agenda.
Biased and pathetic.
As opposed to conservative judges who are completely unbiased...
Yeah, I thought Forge was on something when he said this, "Here is the problem though. This really shouldn't be a close decision. Obviously I have a problem with executive authority being expanded. But regardless of your view, I would think the courts should be able to come up with close to a consensus on this one way or another. Yet here we have another controversial case split on ideological lines I assume."
Then he and Chainpin decided that it was only liberals that did this. I agree that it is a problem that you can know ahead of time what side justices will come down on based on what the law they are ruling on is trying to do. Even if the underlying questions are the same. But it is ridiculous to think that one political bent has a monopoly on this behavior.
I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.