goregrind wrote:
niccolo wrote:
This notion that individual foods can be identified as inherently healthy and unhealthy is a bit silly. You could eat yourself to gross obesity via just fruit (which is mostly sugar, plus water, some quantity of fiber depending on the specific fruit, and a little micronutrients). There are definitely healthy and unhealthy overall diets, though, hinging on macronutrient ratios, micronutrient profiles, and calories. Fruit--but also muffins or donuts--can certainly have a place in a healthy diet.
As for the artificial/natural or processed/unprocessed heuristics, those don't get you much leverage either. That home baked, "organic" (whatever that means) brownie isn't necessarily any better than that commercially produced donut.
The language we use to talk about nutrition seems really broken to me.
Yeah, its all based on "language". Always base what you put in your body on language. According to you, its incorrect to say a certain fruit or vegetable is healthy, and apparently there are all of these people getting fat from eating too many fruits and vegetables. So actually, if you eat less fruit and veg and add donuts, you are better off. Basically, you read some nutrition article you dont understand and now think a banana is the same thing as a donut because people describe bananas wrong.
Ha, well short of interpretive dance, is *is* all language. Heck, even if we could discourse via mindreading, it would still be language, and on this forum, it most certainly is.
I think many people's desire to label thing with the binary healthy/unhealthy label is more misleading than helpful. For example, people will sometimes ask, is fresh-squeezed orange juice healthy? And the answer is, in moderation it can certainly be part of an extremely healthy diet, but in excess you could drink yourself to gross obesity and other severe health consequences. So the question isn't really coherent. And orange juice--water, a bunch of sugar, a little fiber, a little of a few micronutrients--really doesn't look that different from Coke nutritionally, though most people can't get their heads around that.
Lumping fruits and vegetables is another category mistake (but then so is lumping vegetables into a single category). Grapes are basically sugar water, i.e. Coke. Spinach is basically fiber, with some digestible carb and protein thrown in. Those two foods are far more dissimilar than similar. You're never going to eat your way to obesity via spinach, so that one really is mostly a freebie. Grapes, on the other hand, laze around having lovely maidens feed you grapes, and you will get very fat (and suffer a range of other consequences enroute, too).
I have thought deeply about these issues because of a health condition that made them matter a lot more for me than they do for many others. And I find it interesting to discourse about them with others, as we are here. I like feisty discussions, but it sounds like you're actually emotionally frustrated by what I wrote. I'm sorry to hear that, maybe the better solution is for you to just tune me out?