Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Et tu Fiat?
Quote | Reply
https://www.auto123.com/...issions-tests/62223/

Who you got next in the auto manufacturers cheater pool?

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
Quote Reply
Re: Et tu Fiat? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mitsubishi just admitted they've been cheating emissions tests for 25 years . . .

____________________________________
https://lshtm.academia.edu/MikeCallaghan

http://howtobeswiss.blogspot.ch/
Quote Reply
Re: Et tu Fiat? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BLeP wrote:

Who you got next in the auto manufacturers cheater pool?

All of them?

People have said for years that you can expect to actually get fewer mpg than listed on the window sticker, now we know why.

I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.
Quote Reply
Re: Et tu Fiat? [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The reason that your mileage will never match the tests is because the tests are done at slower than normal speeds.

Here's a highway test. Average speed = 48.3 MPH (77 kph)



Who drives that slowly on the highway? Nobody, that's who.

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
Quote Reply
Re: Et tu Fiat? [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Here are the guidelines for the highway test in Canada. Note the temperature and the fact that the engine is warmed up at the time of the test. Everything is basically set for ideal conditions. And it's done at a slow speed.

Highway Test Parameters
Test Cell Temperature20°-30°C
Total time12 minutes, 45 seconds
Distance16.5 km
Top Speed97 km/h
Average Speed78 km/h
Maximum acceleration5.2 km/h per second
Number of stops0
Idling time0
Engine start*Warm

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
Last edited by: BLeP: Apr 27, 16 9:04
Quote Reply
Re: Et tu Fiat? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BLeP wrote:
Maximum acceleration5.2 km/h per second

0-100k in 19.2 seconds!

Actually that sounds about right for some of the people getting on the freeway around these parts.
Quote Reply
Re: Et tu Fiat? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BLeP wrote:
Here are the guidelines for the highway test in Canada. Note the temperature and the fact that the engine is warmed up at the time of the test. Everything is basically set for ideal conditions. And it's done at a slow speed.


Highway Test Parameters
Test Cell Temperature20°-30°C
Total time12 minutes, 45 seconds
Distance16.5 km
Top Speed97 km/h
Average Speed78 km/h
Maximum acceleration5.2 km/h per second
Number of stops0
Idling time0
Engine start*Warm


That's only 1 of the 5 cycles. The High Speed / Quick Acceleration test was added to try and adjust for the not real world conditions of the previous 2-cycles testing.... But I agree, all ideal, engine warm, etc... definitely not reflective...

http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/efficiency/transportation/cars-light-trucks/buying/7495




Quote Reply
Re: Et tu Fiat? [snoots] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Big difference between real world emissions not matching up to test emissions because the tests aren't representative of real world driving, and real world emissions not matching up to test emissions because the manufacturer installed software deliberately designed to exploit how the tests are run.
Quote Reply
Re: Et tu Fiat? [cartsman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Of course there is, I never said otherwise. I was responding to the point raised about the testing...
Quote Reply
Re: Et tu Fiat? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BLeP wrote:
Here are the guidelines for the highway test in Canada. Note the temperature and the fact that the engine is warmed up at the time of the test. Everything is basically set for ideal conditions. And it's done at a slow speed.

Highway Test Parameters
Test Cell Temperature20°-30°C
Total time12 minutes, 45 seconds
Distance16.5 km
Top Speed97 km/h
Average Speed78 km/h
Maximum acceleration5.2 km/h per second
Number of stops0
Idling time0
Engine start*Warm

I wish they had these measures in American. I cannot make any sense of this.

Quote Reply