felipe.g.c wrote:
thanks for your answer! if you want, you can answerts in english, sorry for the post in spanish, i changed it. I may have a good discount in prsix, probably i choose the prsix. you said "son igual en el merito, pero son diferente" can you tell me that in english, i dont urdestand the meaning of "son igual en mérito" (i speak spanish, but i dont understand the idea)
Regards!
what i meant to say is that the CF SLX and the PR6 are equal in
merit. as a
value, they're equal in my mind. however, they aren't the same - they offer value in different ways. for example, the SLX has a more refined front end, with its integrated drink system, 3 different pursuit bar positions and so forth. the PRSix, however, is really easy to work on. less complex. 2 allen keys and you can pretty much do anything on this bike.
i jumped on a PR6 in kona, the day after i arrived. it was built up to match the fit coordinates i sent to them. the bike felt like i'd owned it for a year. so, i don't know if the brands themselves would characterize it this way, but the PR6 takes everything we reliably know about how good bikes work, how they fit and handle, how they should adjust, and places this into a very predictable, high value proposition.
the CF SLX takes everything we know and projects this into a bike that strives to be ahead of the rest of the market, rather than the best exemplar of the market. if you consider the shiv disc, this bike is a moonshot. this is an attempt to take cycling to a new place, with not much consideration for the current state of the art. this is contrary to the thinking behind the PR6. how does the PR6 handle? reliably. predictably. how will the shiv handle? i have no idea. but, maybe, better than the PR6 or any other current bike (that's its claim). or not.
the CF SLX is probably in between QR and specialized in how it views its products.
Dan Empfield
aka Slowman