Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Salmon Steve] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sadly enough, I believe he did.
The sad part is that it seems to overshadow his incredible comeback from cancer.
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Salmon Steve] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
YES but I do not care as all of them are or have. It like crashing. There are two riders. Those who have crashed and those that will crash. Same as doping. Those that have doped or those that will dope.
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [toreishi] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes i think he doped.
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Salmon Steve] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Without a doubt yes.
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [TriBeer] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
TriBeer wrote:
"Overruled!" - Judge TriBeer

I *strenuously* object!!!


Oh, and Yes.


float , hammer , and jog

Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Salmon Steve] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
No.
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Bernard] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Dope, No. Given beneficial treatments, Yes.

"Only those who risk going too far truly know how far one can go"
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nope
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Murphy'sLaw] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
"I *strenuously* object!!!"

That sounds painful. Remember you're in training. Conserve your energy, Law Man.
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Salmon Steve] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes

Summary - Of the 106 posts in this thread when I loaded it ....

Not answered the question - 14
No - 18
Yes - 74 (+my reply = 75)

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Chicks are like Voltron, the more you can get, the better it is." -Tucker
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Salmon Steve] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Hell yes.
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Salmon Steve] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes!
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Murphy'sLaw] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Murphy'sLaw wrote:
TriBeer wrote:
"Overruled!" -
Judge TriBeer


I *strenuously* object!!!


Oh, and Yes.


I * strenuously* object. Is that how it works...
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [AlphaQ] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yup.
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [CaptainCanada] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
CaptainCanada wrote:
First!

Oh wait.

Yes ... Um no, maybe .... Ah fuck it, off to "train"
Would that training nclude a transfusion of blood?
Yes or No ?

__________________________________________________
Official Polar Ambassador
http://www.google.com/...P7RiWyEVwpunlsc2JtQQ
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Bmanners] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
no doubt he did. there is no way that he could have competed at his level when everyone else was.
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [kaolelo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Salmon Steve] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
No
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Salmon Steve] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes (but so did everyone else).

I know I broke the rules but I thought if I put in parenthesis it would not cause me to fail the test. At least that's what Dr Ferrari told me.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * *
http://www.bobswims.com/

"If you didn't swallow water in your last open water race, you weren't racing"
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [E=H2O] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes.

And despite some clueless idiots saying the opposite... no - not ALL of them were doing it.
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [NAB777] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes, he paid off the UCI
Yes, He paid Ferrari $800,000 per year for doping services
Yes, he had access to experimental drugs like Hemmassit
Yes, He tested positive multiple times
Yes, he harassed and smeared anyone who told the truth
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [julian D] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes. All yesses from me.

He who understands the WHY, will understand the HOW.
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Salmon Steve] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes.
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Alvin Tostig] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Unless I believe everything posted on Internet forums there is no way for me to know for sure at this time.

And frankly I don't care. Yet I still respond to this...

Civilize the mind, but make savage the body.

- Chinese proverb
Quote Reply
Re: The Lance Armstrong Yes or No thread.... [Duffy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
yes but only because he had a backdated prescription. and he knew there was no test for EPO in 1999. until 2004. when his positive epo test couldnt' be used against him.


_______________________________________________________________

"the trouble with normal is - it always gets worse"

- Cockburn
Quote Reply

Prev Next