I can't really comment on the stability part of your question. I'm really bad at telling the difference on those sorts of things. I run in several different Hoka's and like them alll for different purposes (Bondi, Clifton, Challenger, Conquest, Stinson). The only Hoka I haven't liked were the Claytons.

I've got around 400 miles on my Conquest. They are a firmer ride than my other Hoka. They also take a bit of "break-in" to start to feel good. At this point they stay in my travel bag and I primarily use them when I know I'll be stuck on hotel treadmills. I haven't tried the infinite.

Thanks, for the feedback. That's quite the arsenal of Hokas.

The Infinite seems to have limited market penetration. I like the theory of a "stabilized" Clifton. I'll likely give them a shot and draw my own conclusion.

Scott

Following this. I've been in Bondi's for several years with general satisfaction (after Decker stopped messing with it) but am looking for a Hoka with more stability.

---

_____________

"Some guys they just give up living, and start dying little by little piece by piece. Some guys come home from work and wash up, then go racin' in the street." Bruce Springsteen

Cool, maybe we'll get some feedback from the Monday morning crowd.

Scott