Trexlera wrote:
gary p wrote:
Swam a meet Sunday. Went 20:53 in the 1650y free. That was 20 seconds slower than my goal, but 24 seconds faster than my previous best. Been doing lots of long sets (+/- 25 reps) of steady-pace 100's on 15-20 seconds rest, hoping my pace there would translate to a sustainable race pace for the 1650. That turned out to be a little optimistic.
Depending on how much rest, that *could* be a reasonable proxy. Did you start on pace and die, or hold an even pace that was a second per hundred slower?
I think some longer intervals are also really useful, even if they wind up being slower than mile pace. A favorite set of mine is 10x300. This complements rather than replacing the 100s.
Leading up to the race, I was able to do 25 X 100 at < 1:14 on a 1:35 interval. I once was even able to do 20 of them on a 1:30 interval. Was hoping, when adding time for a 4th flip turn, that would translate to a sustainable 1:15/100 pace for the 1650. Wasn't really the case. I was already over 1:15/100 by the 300y mark. Went 1:16.50 on the 5th 100, and kept in the 1:16.5-1:16.9 range though the 1000 mark. I was a little more ragged on the third 500, with 100 splits between 1:16.5 and 1:17.9 . Went 1:16.4 on the 16th hundred, and closed with a final 50 of :35.20.
Long story short, it wasn't the
optimal race execution, but it was far from a "go out fast and die" train wreck. The guy in the lane next to me was a good example of that; he was 6 seconds ahead of me at the 500 mark, but I caught him by ~900, and finished 21 seconds ahead of him.
Now that I have an actual benchmark race pace (last time I raced the 1650 was 2 years ago, and I wasn't really training for that distance at that time), I'll definitely be noodling with different distances going forward. I suspect I'll find 16-20 x 150 on ~20 seconds rest is going to be a better proxy for my actual average pace from 500-1500
"They're made of latex, not nitroglycerin"