Stindiana wrote:
Tom:
Totally agree. Quality and Safety are #1
And now we open the real issue. Professional operational standards for our sport.
Please take us all to the section on field inspection allowing organizers to continue producing a multi-sport event? Oh, that's right. That was voted down in the mid-90's. We are a 40+ year old sport and we have nearly zero real, hard requirements to entry. Please show us all the NFL's owners licence agreement which might be confused with a US Congressional bill in size. Massive. Detailed. Options for dismissal/revocation.
That Hot Dog stand has to pass a health inspection annually. And at random intervals. They and their staff have to pass a Serve Safe test. Smart customers watch how they handle money vs. food. If that owners has serious issues or even a death; you can bet there is a huge investigation.
We are not considering the events that are still around after 5-10-15 years +. NGO's and the customers have spoken and they have survived the American business climate post 2008. We are talking about the 1-2-3 year old events that have jumped into what seems to be a exciting way to make a buck. It can be and many are just fine. But some are NOT. Some are even lead by non-athletes who have never even been in OW.
And while you might not like how this is stated and all the chatter; please understand we have looked ten's of thousands of athletes and families in the eye and told them we will do everything in our power to give you one of the best days of your life. Nearly 100% of my family and friends are triathletes; wife and 3 of 4 children. We don't take this lightly. We live it. When our son says he wants to race a triathlon; we start asking a ton of questions. If you are in the restaurant business and go out to eat with your family; do you go just anywhere?
There needs to be standards.
Reading from all accounts, you are a good fellow. Which was my presumption from the start. You and your race series appear to be under a serious amount of competitive pressure. If you want to champion higher standards for races and RDs - if you think that will help you competitively - go for it.
This is why I believe you're getting blow back here:
You're targeting your message to the wrong people. The folks responding here, seasoned triathletes who regularly participate on ST, are of course hyper-informed. Do you think any of us are going to race in some shoddy, fly-by-night, crapola race? I can guarantee you, almost zero percent reading here will. I would only race in races that are up to snuff. "Big brands" or Independents (I've raced WTC to Norseman). By the way, I couldn't care less if a race was run by an athlete. I only care if a race is well run.
So... my potential race universe (races I would would consider entering) has few issues with safety (perceived and/or real), etc.
I would hazzard that experienced triathletes have a very good handle on which races are good and "safe" and which ones aren't. Plus, I would also say that you aren't going to get athletes to champion race safety. We're the customers. It's our expectation that safety will be provided. Raising race standards isn't up to us. We just vote with our wallet.
My questions to you if you care to share: What are you trying to achieve with all of this? And who are you really trying to reach with your message? It's really not clear.