ahhchon wrote:
so you're saying the ftp that i should use is the one in TT position for 20 minutes? makes sense. i have just never read that. never had a coach tell me that etc etc.
regardless, i'm not going to base my ride off the new FTP. i'm going to base it off of the 205 that i attained on the trainer indoors, just to be safe. It's a difficult one. Some options from most conservative to least conservative (using 80% of FTP for each option):
- Go off the 205w number. This should be conservative and achievable. (race target 164w)
- Do an indoor TT test today/tomorrow and then ride 80% of that number at the weekend to see how it feels. (race target of 172w if you hit 215w indoors)
- Go off the 230w number. You may overcook it slightly (race target 184w)
That leaves you with a potential 20w difference in race strategy which is a big spread this close to the race. Ideally you would have done this test 6 weeks ago, and then you would have had 4 big weekend varying the bike target number by 5-10w and/or varying the off-the-bike run pacing by 5-10s per mile to build confidence in the strategy and test nutrition.
With that disclaimer out the way; the spread isn't so ridiculous that you'll destroy yourself if you're sensible in the race. You can look up average heart rate for previous races and/or recent race-like bike rides and use that as a guide too. If you pick a target and during the race you feel more breathless, your HR is 5bpm+ higher than previous races, and the watts aren't coming easy after 1-2 hours, you can drop the power target during the race without having to zombie-walk the run.
A good exercise is to put the power numbers into BestBikeSplit and it will estimate time differences based on different watt targets. (Picking numbers out of my arse) Let's say the higher watt target translates to 13 minute time saving. You would have to run 30s per mile faster to make up this time difference on the run. Depending on your run confidence, you may judge it worth the risk to go at the higher watt number, IF you think running 30s/mile slower than your run target is easily achievable.
Your FTP dropping from 250+ to 205 seems like a big drop though in one year, which is an interesting x-factor. I'd be curious if you knew why it dropped.