BBB1975 wrote:
sinkinswimmer wrote:
Maybe the disagreement is because many folks don't understand physics.
No Dev...the disagreement is simple. An ironman is 140.6 miles or it isn't. Cobble, Staz, the rest of the world, and I think it is. You, and your friends at TriMuskoka think its not.
And I do get physics. Do you get how a GPS works? When it says 112 miles...stop pedaling. And next time, don't think you are smarter than us because you have some bullshit excuse for cutting these courses, think again. You are usually better than that.
Bike racing is different than swimming and running. Wind and terrain can make distance a very poor indicator of effort required to do a bike course.
Guys...please relax...the course at Muskoka is now the "full 180K distance" (maybe someone can change the thread title now). You also get to do 2200+ of climbing. I hope Sinkinswimmer shows up to race and when he gets to 160 k and his race time is the same as 180K at IMFlorida or Arizona there will be 20K with a ton of climbing left to go.
By the way, we could go tell Fredrik Van Lierde and Jodie Swallow that they did not complete an IM at South Africa and should not get their auto Kona slots. Bike course there was short, but it is impossible to make it exactly 180K on a dual loop course with tons of road closures....distance was
ONLY 177K. There was a ton of climbing and wind to more than make up for the missing 3K. As an example Jodie Swallow's bike split was like 20 minutes slower than Kona on that South Africa course even though it was short.