So under-BB brakes are getting more common. Many, like those on the Cervelo P4 and Trek Speed Concepts, have been highly integrated into the chainstays, and there is little doubt that those would give you a net aero gain vs mounting a brake conventionally up high. But I wonder what the data says about a brake like this? Air still has to pass around the BB shell, and this brake is right in that flow path. At least a conventionally mounted brake can 'draft' off the rear of the seat tube and seatstays. Has anyone ever done any testing to show a brake mounted like this (below) is actually more aerodynamic? Seems hard to imagine that it would be.
Advanced Aero TopTube Storage for Road, Gravel, & Tri...ZeroSlip & Direct-mount, made in the USA.
DarkSpeedWorks.com.....Reviews.....Insta.....Facebook
--
Advanced Aero TopTube Storage for Road, Gravel, & Tri...ZeroSlip & Direct-mount, made in the USA.
DarkSpeedWorks.com.....Reviews.....Insta.....Facebook
--
Last edited by:
DarkSpeedWorks: Apr 18, 14 17:23