Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: Felt DA4, Fuji Norcom 2.1 or Chinese? [rruff] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rruff wrote:
The headtube is fat

Fat?

Quote Reply
Re: Felt DA4, Fuji Norcom 2.1 or Chinese? [slow123] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
slow123 wrote:
rruff wrote:
The headtube is fat


Fat?

Phat

Alex Arman

Strava
Quote Reply
Re: Felt DA4, Fuji Norcom 2.1 or Chinese? [slow123] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes, it's fat. And like I said it isn't as deep as other headtubes either.

Below are the head tube width dimensions from cyclenutnz:

Fuji Norcom Straight 48/43/53
Trek Speed Concept MKII 32/32/37.
Cervelo P3C 35
Cervelo P2C 35
Quote Reply
Re: Felt DA4, Fuji Norcom 2.1 or Chinese? [rruff] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rruff wrote:
Yes, it's fat. And like I said it isn't as deep as other headtubes either.

Below are the head tube width dimensions from cyclenutnz:

Fuji Norcom Straight 48/43/53
Trek Speed Concept MKII 32/32/37.
Cervelo P3C 35
Cervelo P2C 35

I wonder what the obrea ordu is? The NS looks so similar to that bike...


Quote Reply
Re: Felt DA4, Fuji Norcom 2.1 or Chinese? [slow123] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Might be the old one, but the list says 49mm. frame tubing measurements list. None of the Orbeas have tested well in the WT.
Quote Reply
Re: Felt DA4, Fuji Norcom 2.1 or Chinese? [rruff] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rruff wrote:
Yes, it's fat. And like I said it isn't as deep as other headtubes either.

Below are the head tube width dimensions from cyclenutnz:

Fuji Norcom Straight 48/43/53
Trek Speed Concept MKII 32/32/37.
Cervelo P3C 35
Cervelo P2C 35

Cervelo P5 45/38

Also probably worth noting is that, unlike the Cervelo models, the NS has the brake behind the fork crown. This requires a wider head tube at the base to 'blend' things into the down tube, but also eliminates the drag created by a front-facing brake.
Quote Reply
Re: Felt DA4, Fuji Norcom 2.1 or Chinese? [Andrew Coggan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I didn't list the P5 or other bikes with really deep headtubes because it isn't really comparable. The Norcom's headtube isn't even 3-1, but the P5 is way over that.


Quote Reply
Re: Felt DA4, Fuji Norcom 2.1 or Chinese? [slow123] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
It's hard to look at the headtube when you get distracted by that mess of a base bar.
Quote Reply
Re: Felt DA4, Fuji Norcom 2.1 or Chinese? [Rambler] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Rambler wrote:
It's hard to look at the headtube when you get distracted by that mess of a base bar.

Better?


Quote Reply
Re: Felt DA4, Fuji Norcom 2.1 or Chinese? [Andrew Coggan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes! Fuji should hire you to clean up that front end.
Quote Reply
Re: Felt DA4, Fuji Norcom 2.1 or Chinese? [PedSwe] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Just thought I´d update... I went for a Felt DA4 in the end.[/img]

Sorry for the lousy mobile picture... Anyway, I got rid of the Vision 52/38 chainset and put on my Gossamer with Sram 54/42 chainrings. The wheels got changed asap as well. I will need to get the 70 x 30 stem as well to get a proper fit and to make sure the UCI will be happy. A bit weird that it comes stock with just one fixed position stem.

Oh, by the way I had to get a 0 offset seatpost as well to make it function in UCI TTs.
Quote Reply

Prev Next