Calendar
Retailers
Stack & Reach
Custom Geometry Calculator
Online Training Log
MAIN
INDEX
RULES &
LEGEND
LOG
IN
Search
this forum
this category
all forums
for
All words
Any words
Whole Phrase
(
options
)
Newsletter Signup
Slowtwitch Forums
:
Triathlon Forum
:
??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)??
Tri Forum
Classifieds
Lavender Room
Jobs
The Womens
Print Thread
xntrickly
Oct 3, 08 14:46
Post #1 of 17 (649 views)
??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)??
Can't Post
I have gotten a little carried away with my wheel inventory and have to decide which has to go ...
1. 2.4 PT hub laced to Blackwell 100s with sapim spokes and stock 100 wheel on the front. Vittoria CX tires 20mm and really nicely matched with the width of the rim. Hub torque value is 517 (5 above the 512 default) so pretty accurate.
2. 2.4 PT hub laced to Zipp 808 with sapim spokes and stock 808 wheel on the front. Hub torque value is 516 (4 above default) so even more accurate.
3. Hed Stinger 90/60 just purchased with beautiful tires and which are very very nice but I'll need to sell the 60 and replace it with a 90 and put a PT hub in the rear for pacing the bike efforts.
I can not find any data on the 100s versus the 808s versus the 90s???
sure appreciate any assistance making up my mind.
pjcampbell
Oct 3, 08 17:17
Post #2 of 17 (604 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [xntrickly]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
Can you tell me what the hub torque value means?
I run all 2.4 PT hubs but not sure what this means.
xntrickly
Oct 3, 08 19:55
Post #3 of 17 (567 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [pjcampbell]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To
Can you tell me what the hub torque value means?
I run all 2.4 PT hubs but not sure what this means.
My understanding (if you want to call it that) is that there's a torque value that the hub uses to help calculate wattage using algorithms and other information from the hub. You can get there by going into test mode (squeezing both buttons past find and past clear then release) and hit the mode button until the t flashes. Once there you hit the select button to toggle to the third option which is hub and the middle line is the torque value for the hub (please consult the owners manual as I am going by memory and I'm sitting here enjoying Chilean wine and aged cheese). The default value is 512 and Saris says that +/-10 of the value is "within specs". I'm pretty sure that if your middle number is below the 512 default then the hub is over-estimating your wattage. I have two and they are at 516 and 517 and when I rode another set of wheels with a value of 506 my numbers on those wheels were noticeably higher (which I liked heh heh).
hope this helps. As I posted elsewhere it really doesn't matter because you use the taps and training software to keep track of TSS etc and for pacing. It doesn't matter if one set of wheels says your LTw is 300 or 280 so long as you know what it is for a particular hub/cpu.
just my .02 cents.
best regards.
xntrickly
Oct 5, 08 6:59
Post #4 of 17 (480 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [xntrickly]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
Hoping that someone might help me make a decision as to which wheels to keep... looking to see if any folks have seen how the 100s compare to the other wheels mentioned because they all feel very fast.
Gotta sell some wheels so let me know any information you might have.
thanks.
bella
Oct 5, 08 7:07
Post #5 of 17 (473 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [xntrickly]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
I have had the 404's. Hed 90 and now have the 100's. Personally I would sell the Zipp due to higher resale value. The 100's are fast and light and more reasonablly priced, plus since Blackwell may not be around anymore, the resale values have been low. So to get the biggest bang for you buck sell the over priced Zipps.
S
xntrickly
Oct 5, 08 7:10
Post #6 of 17 (469 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [bella]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To
I have had the 404's. Hed 90 and now have the 100's. Personally I would sell the Zipp due to higher resale value. The 100's are fast and light and more reasonablly priced, plus since Blackwell may not be around anymore, the resale values have been low. So to get the biggest bang for you buck sell the over priced Zipps.
S
Have to admit I was leaning the same way... I rode the 100s yesterday in very windy conditions and I thought they did very well and once I got the damn wind behind me I really liked them (they sound like discs when you stand up). May I ask your thoughts on the 90? I've got a rear and the front is a 60 so I was wondering about building up the 90 rear with a 2.4 hub and then getting a front 90 -- but those might be just like the 90s when I'm all done?
thanks for the help.
Dave Luscan
Oct 5, 08 7:15
Post #7 of 17 (465 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [xntrickly]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
I agree with keeping the 100's, in regards to resale value as mentioned previously and the Blackwells are great wheels. Good fit with tires and everyone rides Zipps.
So a question...if my hub torque value is greater than 512 (519) is my power underestimated?
http://www.pacificfit.net
xntrickly
Oct 5, 08 7:30
Post #8 of 17 (449 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [soulswimmer]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To
I agree with keeping the 100's, in regards to resale value as mentioned previously and the Blackwells are great wheels. Good fit with tires and everyone rides Zipps.
So a question...if my hub torque value is greater than 512 (519) is my power underestimated?
I have only had one conversation with Saris (about this) and what I got from them was that the torque value is used for calculating wattage (along with other information from the hub) and that if the number was below 512 (in the Aeolus wheels it was 506) the algorithm
may
exaggerate the number on the CPU (because with the Aeolus wheels I was suddenly/noticeably putting out better numbers that I had previously seen with my zipps (torque value of 516) and blackwells (torque value of 517). I would say yes to being underestimated because my comprehension (very limited admittedly) of the algorithm is that the further away we are from the 512 the more amplification in the wattage value you see on your CPU. If our torque values were all 512 then we'd not have to wonder.
Accuracy of wattage can be calculated by comparing your previous performances (knowing your CdA) and all other variables (wind speed, slope, air density etc.) and using the models (e.g. on analyticcycling.com) to calculate required wattage to meet the performances you have achieved. I plan on doing this if I could get off the dang computer!!!
Tom A.
Oct 5, 08 7:32
Post #9 of 17 (448 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [xntrickly]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To
In Reply To
Can you tell me what the hub torque value means?
I run all 2.4 PT hubs but not sure what this means.
My understanding (if you want to call it that) is that there's a torque value that the hub uses to help calculate wattage using algorithms and other information from the hub. You can get there by going into test mode (squeezing both buttons past find and past clear then release) and hit the mode button until the t flashes. Once there you hit the select button to toggle to the third option which is hub and the middle line is the torque value for the hub (please consult the owners manual as I am going by memory and I'm sitting here enjoying Chilean wine and aged cheese). T
he default value is 512 and Saris says that +/-10 of the value is "within specs". I'm pretty sure that if your middle number is below the 512 default then the hub is over-estimating your wattage. I have two and they are at 516 and 517 and when I rode another set of wheels with a value of 506 my numbers on those wheels were noticeably higher (which I liked heh heh)
.
Ummm....no. The torque value you are describing is the "zero offset" value, or fixed bias. Basically, it's the torque reading the head needs to subtract from the torque output to get the "true" torque being input. If it's different that 512, it makes absolutely no difference on the power readings IF YOU'VE PROPERLY SET THE ZERO OFFSET for your combo of head unit and hub.
When first pairing a hub with a head unit, it is ALWAYS good to manually "zero" this offset (see your manual), since if the offset transmitted by the hub is too far outside a certain range of the number stored in the head unit, it can't automatically zero. Oh yeah...ALWAYS set the head unit to "auto-zero" (again, see manual) since this zeros head unit every time you coast. That way, any drift of the offset during the ride due to temp changes, etc. will be removed.
Now, if you properly did the zeroing when switching wheelsets and you felt that one was reading higher or lower, then the "slope" of the torque curve for one may be off. This can be checked with the "torque" display by hanging known weights from the crankarm and comparing the torque reading with the torque calculated at the hub. This is sometimes know as "stomp" testing (since a quick and dirty, but not very accurate, way to do this is using body weight). See the following for a description:
http://midweekclub.ca/powerFAQ.htm#Q23
So...in short, when zeroed properly, the zero torque numbers you described above have absolutely NO affect on the hub's accuracy.
Just my 2 centavos ;-)
Tom A.
Oct 5, 08 7:36
Post #10 of 17 (442 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [xntrickly]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To
Accuracy of wattage can be calculated by comparing your previous performances (knowing your CdA) and all other variables (wind speed, slope, air density etc.) and using the models (e.g. on analyticcycling.com) to calculate required wattage to meet the performances you have achieved. I plan on doing this if I could get off the dang computer!!!
You're better off checking the static torque value by hanging known weights on the crank as I described above. Trying to compare it to calculations, even from hillclimbs, is fraught with difficulty and really not worth it.
As Robert Chung might say: "The PT has a 9 key...use it" ;-)
xntrickly
Oct 5, 08 7:45
Post #11 of 17 (431 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [Tom A.]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To
In Reply To
In Reply To
Can you tell me what the hub torque value means?
I run all 2.4 PT hubs but not sure what this means.
My understanding (if you want to call it that) is that there's a torque value that the hub uses to help calculate wattage using algorithms and other information from the hub. You can get there by going into test mode (squeezing both buttons past find and past clear then release) and hit the mode button until the t flashes. Once there you hit the select button to toggle to the third option which is hub and the middle line is the torque value for the hub (please consult the owners manual as I am going by memory and I'm sitting here enjoying Chilean wine and aged cheese). T
he default value is 512 and Saris says that +/-10 of the value is "within specs". I'm pretty sure that if your middle number is below the 512 default then the hub is over-estimating your wattage. I have two and they are at 516 and 517 and when I rode another set of wheels with a value of 506 my numbers on those wheels were noticeably higher (which I liked heh heh)
.
Ummm....no. The torque value you are describing is the "zero offset" value, or fixed bias. Basically, it's the torque reading the head needs to subtract from the torque output to get the "true" torque being input. If it's different that 512, it makes absolutely no difference on the power readings IF YOU'VE PROPERLY SET THE ZERO OFFSET for your combo of head unit and hub.
When first pairing a hub with a head unit, it is ALWAYS good to manually "zero" this offset (see your manual), since if the offset transmitted by the hub is too far outside a certain range of the number stored in the head unit, it can't automatically zero. Oh yeah...ALWAYS set the head unit to "auto-zero" (again, see manual) since this zeros head unit every time you coast. That way, any drift of the offset during the ride due to temp changes, etc. will be removed.
Now, if you properly did the zeroing when switching wheelsets and you felt that one was reading higher or lower, then the "slope" of the torque curve for one may be off. This can be checked with the "torque" display by hanging known weights from the crankarm and comparing the torque reading with the torque calculated at the hub. This is sometimes know as "stomp" testing (since a quick and dirty, but not very accurate, way to do this is using body weight). See the following for a description:
http://midweekclub.ca/powerFAQ.htm#Q23
So...in short, when zeroed properly, the zero torque numbers you described above have absolutely NO affect on the hub's accuracy.
Just my 2 centavos ;-)
Man I just join this community and I already am probably leading people astray!!!
Glad I put the caveat that I talked to Saris about this once.
I am referring to the 2.4 hubset and was told that that the stomp test was not applicable because of the test mode in the new CPU. According to the manual it says on page 37 that:
The bottom display is the offset torque value directly sent by the hub torque with no correction applied. the hub sends a value of approximately 512 as the zero point. The middle line display is the correction offset value currently stored in the computer. This is the value that is changed when you do a manual zeroing of the torque. the top display is the corrected actual torque (the bottom value minus the middle value).
Not sure that this helps. I was relaying what Saris told me to explain why the Aeolus wheels were giving me "nicer" numbers. I originally called them to ask whether the 16 spokes in the rear wheel impacted the accuracy of the hub because of less spokes impacting the accuracy of the strain gauge (to which there was a NO repsonse). The then took me to the value mentioned above and it was 506 and then it was offered that was a possible source of amplification because I told her yes I did do a zero-torque before using the wheels because the rider who's wheels I used could not recall the last time he performed the zero-torque.
thanks for the help, do not want to mislead folks.
p.VDB
Oct 5, 08 8:51
Post #12 of 17 (406 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [xntrickly]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
I have two powertaps sl 2.4 a 2008 model and a 2007 model.
2007 model gives 548
2008 model gives 526
What does the 548 number mean? It's complete out of the range you gave (512 plusminus 10)
_________
Paul
xntrickly
Oct 5, 08 10:27
Post #13 of 17 (357 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [p.VDB]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To
I have two powertaps sl 2.4 a 2008 model and a 2007 model.
2007 model gives 548
2008 model gives 526
What does the 548 number mean? It's complete out of the range you gave (512 plusminus 10)
Man I wish I knew... do you zero-torque your hub very often? Do you have the upgrades to the CPU (e.g. when you turn on your PT does it say 5.67 on the bottom right of the screen)??
Call Saris and ask them about your values and see what they say. Sorry I can't help more.
Tom A.
Oct 5, 08 19:04
Post #14 of 17 (277 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [xntrickly]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To
Man I just join this community and I already am probably leading people astray!!!
Glad I put the caveat that I talked to Saris about this once.
I am referring to the 2.4 hubset and was told that that the stomp test was not applicable because of the test mode in the new CPU. According to the manual it says on page 37 that:
The bottom display is the offset torque value directly sent by the hub torque with no correction applied. the hub sends a value of approximately 512 as the zero point. The middle line display is the correction offset value currently stored in the computer. This is the value that is changed when you do a manual zeroing of the torque. the top display is the corrected actual torque (the bottom value minus the middle value).
Not sure that this helps. I was relaying what Saris told me to explain why the Aeolus wheels were giving me "nicer" numbers. I originally called them to ask whether the 16 spokes in the rear wheel impacted the accuracy of the hub because of less spokes impacting the accuracy of the strain gauge (to which there was a NO repsonse). The then took me to the value mentioned above and it was 506 and then it was offered that was a possible source of amplification because I told her yes I did do a zero-torque before using the wheels because the rider who's wheels I used could not recall the last time he performed the zero-torque.
No worries...it sounds like there was a misunderstanding somewhere between you and Saris. That test mode has been in place in the PTs for a LONG time.
The static calibration check (i.e. "stomp test") IS applicable, and is available to you using the same button pushes that allow you to manually zero. Basically, you just put the computer into "torque mode" (the same way you do it to manually zero) and then instead of holding the right button down, you just leave it and hang the weights and read out the torque value.
BTW, the 16 spokes should have no bearing on the accuracy of the hub.
xntrickly
Oct 6, 08 5:00
Post #15 of 17 (214 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [Tom A.]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To
In Reply To
No worries...it sounds like there was a misunderstanding somewhere between you and Saris. That test mode has been in place in the PTs for a LONG time.
The static calibration check (i.e. "stomp test") IS applicable, and is available to you using the same button pushes that allow you to manually zero. Basically, you just put the computer into "torque mode" (the same way you do it to manually zero) and then instead of holding the right button down, you just leave it and hang the weights and read out the torque value.
BTW, the 16 spokes should have no bearing on the accuracy of the hub.
If one does the stomp test and finds out that their hub is off, what can be done to correct it?
All year long I've been thinking that this fellow's Aeolus wheels are off because he'd send me his data for the same ride and his numbers would indicate more power for the same ride even though I would be hurting him (yes we weigh the same). Then I get on his wheels this past weekend and I was immediately suspicious and zero'd his hub. I was suspicious because the numbers I was seeing were easily 8-10% higher and in fact just one quick sprint and I saw my best peak watts for the year (even though I know I have tried much harder during the year)?
Regardless, thanks for the assistance through all of this.
Tom A.
Oct 6, 08 7:12
Post #16 of 17 (172 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [xntrickly]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To
In Reply To
In Reply To
No worries...it sounds like there was a misunderstanding somewhere between you and Saris. That test mode has been in place in the PTs for a LONG time.
The static calibration check (i.e. "stomp test") IS applicable, and is available to you using the same button pushes that allow you to manually zero. Basically, you just put the computer into "torque mode" (the same way you do it to manually zero) and then instead of holding the right button down, you just leave it and hang the weights and read out the torque value.
BTW, the 16 spokes should have no bearing on the accuracy of the hub.
If one does the stomp test and finds out that their hub is off, what can be done to correct it?
Nothing...you can't change the "slope" calibration of the torque reading like you can with an SRM. If you find it to be off, the best thing is to contact Saris and they'll probably want you to send it in for service/evaluation. However, at least being able to CHECK it is a big plus!
When hanging the weights, you want to be VERY careful that you get "good" readings. Use at least 50# of weight (I used two 25# plates that I had weighed separately) and also make sure that the crankarm is dead level. One way I've found that makes things easy is to put the bike in a trainer and don't have the resistance roller pressed against the tire. Then, rotate the wheel SLOOOOWLY backwards and lift the weights off the ground and up to horizontal and look for the maximum reading. Due to inertia effects, you'll have to VERY SLOWLY move the wheel back and forth and then hold it and let it "settle" near the horizontal point to get a true maximum reading.
Despite the name "stomp test", I don't recommend trying to do it with either your, or somebody else's body weight...there's just too much room for error.
That said...apparently having the slope calibration be "off" is fairly rare with a PT. Not having it zeroed corrrectly is MUCH more common.
xntrickly
Oct 6, 08 7:48
Post #17 of 17 (148 views)
Re: ??Wheel selection 90s, 808s, 100s (Blackwell)?? [Tom A.]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To
In Reply To
In Reply To
In Reply To
Nothing...you can't change the "slope" calibration of the torque reading like you can with an SRM. If you find it to be off, the best thing is to contact Saris and they'll probably want you to send it in for service/evaluation. However, at least being able to CHECK it is a big plus!
When hanging the weights, you want to be VERY careful that you get "good" readings. Use at least 50# of weight (I used two 25# plates that I had weighed separately) and also make sure that the crankarm is dead level. One way I've found that makes things easy is to put the bike in a trainer and don't have the resistance roller pressed against the tire. Then, rotate the wheel SLOOOOWLY backwards and lift the weights off the ground and up to horizontal and look for the maximum reading. Due to inertia effects, you'll have to VERY SLOWLY move the wheel back and forth and then hold it and let it "settle" near the horizontal point to get a true maximum reading.
Despite the name "stomp test", I don't recommend trying to do it with either your, or somebody else's body weight...there's just too much room for error.
That said...apparently having the slope calibration be "off" is fairly rare with a PT. Not having it zeroed corrrectly is MUCH more common.
HUGE THANKS for the detailed directions... Agreed on all fronts. I'd have to say that I've been ecstatic with the accuracy of the hubs though I would like to think I can push more watts ;) That's the only disappointing thing about these powermeters... you can no longer BS about what you are capable of relative to others... Raining around here today so may get to do the test later on. Many thanks.
Print Thread
Off Season
What will you do in the off season?
Bike focus
MTB or 'cross
No training
Run focus
Swim focus
What offseason?
XC ski or snowshoe