Slowtwitch.com Main Index MAIN
INDEX 		Forum Rules & Legend RULES &
LEGEND 		Log in LOG
IN 		 
 
 
Search for (options)
Newsletter Signup

Slowtwitch Forums: Triathlon Forum:
Polar CS200 CAD

 
  Tri ForumClassifiedsLavender RoomJobsThe Womens


2107

Jun 21, 08 14:43

Post #1 of 4 (189 views)
Polar CS200 CAD Can't Post
My Sigma 1606 wireless speed sensor is not working and does not fit on my fork. I was thinking to change to Polar CS 200 CAD since I already have a Polar HRM. How it works? PRO and CONS of this bike computer?


Raptor

Jun 21, 08 15:02

Post #2 of 4 (184 views)
Re: Polar CS200 CAD [2107] [In reply to] Can't Post
I have no issues. I have 2 CS100s and 1 CS200 on the various bikes that I have with cadence on all of them. On my last build last week, I added a CS100 to it. I do not need the additional ride recording of the CS200 so I got the CS100.


sailnfast

Jun 21, 08 17:25

Post #3 of 4 (167 views)
Re: Polar CS200 CAD [2107] [In reply to] Can't Post
In Reply To:
My Sigma 1606 wireless speed sensor is not working and does not fit on my fork. I was thinking to change to Polar CS 200 CAD since I already have a Polar HRM. How it works? PRO and CONS of this bike computer?
I have the CS200cad on both my tri and road bikes and it's a great little unit that does everything I want and then some. I also have a Polar HRM (RS200) which makes it simple when transitioning from the bike to the run.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“Time is limited, so I better wake up every morning fresh and know that I have just one chance to live this particular day right, and to string my days together into a life of action, and purpose.” --Lance Armstrong

Off season = lots of riding!


mixedplate

Jun 23, 08 15:33

Post #4 of 4 (122 views)
Re: Polar CS200 CAD [2107] [In reply to] Can't Post
My wife and I both use the CS200CAD and love it. It's easy to use, nice having speed/cadence/HR on one display and as a previous poster mentioned, it makes transitioning to the run where we use Polar wrist units very convenient.

The only "con" I can think of was that the effective working distance between the cadence sensor and the computer could have been a bit longer for more flexible mounting options. It wasn't that big of a deal but needed to pay attention when I was figuring out where to mount things.

* * * * *

Practice makes better