Bike Shops
Coaches
Fitters
Race Calendar
*NEW* Running Stores
Stack & Reach
Training Log
Triathlon Clubs
MAIN
INDEX
RULES &
LEGEND
LOG
IN
Search
this forum
this category
all forums
for
All words
Any words
Whole Phrase
(
options
)
Newsletter Signup
Slowtwitch Forums
:
Triathlon Forum
:
Drag differences (watts or seconds per 40k) for different bottle set ups
1
2
3
View All
Tri Forum
Classifieds
Lavender Room
Jobs
The Womens
Print Thread
Dynamic Du
Nov 5, 09 22:14
Post #51 of 62 (649 views)
Re: Drag differences (watts or seconds per 40k) for different bottle set ups [MITaerobike]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To:
In Reply To:
2. On a really aero frame, the biggest difference in drag (at low yaw) between a bare bike and 2 bottles (DT and ST), is about 40-50 grams of drag at 30 mph (rho=1.205 kg/m^3). For a Shiv/Transition, this is about 7-9% of the total bike drag so it's a very significant amount of drag increase.
3. On Shiv/Transition, a bottle on the DT is more aero than on the ST. We've prototyped frames with both and the data is very convincing (about 10-15 grams of drag difference). Yes, this is hard to measure with a rider pedaling but the data seems to correlate pretty well with and without riders on the bike.
Cheers,
Mark
Thanks for the information Mark, it is really appreciated.
Can anyone transalte 40-50grams of drag into time per 40km and 10-15 grams of drag.
I appreciate the researchers measure and talk in these units but it means nothing to the regular/lay person.
All we care about is speed/time - I think the researchers would go a long way at bridging the gap and getting people more informed if they talked in units that we all understand.
I found this
"20 grams of drag reduction means 10 seconds at 25 mph over 40 kilometers "
here
http://www.cadencecycling.com/...s/Cervelo/CerveloP4/
it is correct?
If so we're looking at lets say 20 to 30 seconds difference over 40km for a bare bike v's a bike with two bottles.
Now - if you HAVE TO HAVE bottles that doesn't seem like a lot to worry about - especially as any bottle is going to add time in this case. So I'm thinking that just wacking two bottles on the Seat and Down tubes of the bike won't be much of a penaly - particularly when you have to get off and run 10 or more kms and most of your competitors will have some sort of bottles somewhere too - so they are having an equal penalty.
Perhaps aero bottles on the down tube are better yeah???
(This post was
edited
by Dynamic Du on Nov 5, 09 22:25)
FiveThirteen
Nov 5, 09 23:36
Post #52 of 62 (633 views)
Re: Drag differences (watts or seconds per 40k) for different bottle set ups [Dynamic Du]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
Props to Mark. You're the kind of poster that makes this forum awesome.
Brind-Surch
Nov 6, 09 1:20
Post #53 of 62 (618 views)
Re: Drag differences (watts or seconds per 40k) for different bottle set ups [FiveThirteen]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
Something else i was wondering was how much of an effect a empty bottle cage has on drag, as i am thinking baout putting a bottle cage on my tt bike when i do longer 80km tt
Andy
FiveThirteen
Nov 6, 09 7:22
Post #54 of 62 (578 views)
Re: Drag differences (watts or seconds per 40k) for different bottle set ups [Brind-Surch]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To:
Something else i was wondering was how much of an effect a empty bottle cage has on drag, as i am thinking baout putting a bottle cage on my tt bike when i do longer 80km tt
Andy
Why?
Andrew Coggan
Nov 6, 09 7:39
Post #55 of 62 (567 views)
Re: Drag differences (watts or seconds per 40k) for different bottle set ups [Dynamic Du]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To:
Can anyone transalte 40-50grams of drag into time per 40km and 10-15 grams of drag.
Memorize this (I did):
0.1 lbs (50 g) of drag (at 30 mph) = 0.5 s/km = 5 W = 0.005 m^2 CdA = 0.0005 Crr
The above rule-of-thumb (which refers to changes) is based on various assumptions/rounding everything to a 1 or a 5, but is fairly accurate and hence quite handy when doing in-your-head (or back-of-the-envelope) calculations.
MITaerobike
Nov 6, 09 8:53
Post #56 of 62 (538 views)
Re: Drag differences (watts or seconds per 40k) for different bottle set ups [Dynamic Du]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
Yeah, sorry we got a bit off track there talking about CFD. Great convo though everyone. We'll be talking more about this for sure. My experience is really in wind tunnel testing and I have a lot to learn in the computational world. I had already set up flow conditions for yaw testing as Tom and Chris have suggested. The rotating wheel things are pretty equation and setup depended so we'll need to chat.
Here's some numbers for you (Dynamic Du):
1. Dr. Coggan's conversion numbers are spot on, and based on 30 mph, the speed we usually test at.
2. Using my data of a bare bike versus a DT and ST water bottle or a poorly placed frame bottle increasing CdA by 0.005 CdA or ~40 gF at 30 mph:
At 30 mph:
7.3 Watt savings holding the same speed
At the same power output, this would be a .22 mph increase from 30 mph to 30.22 mph
This is 22 seconds saved over 40 km
At 24.86 mph (40 kph):
4.1 Watt savings holding the same speed
At the same power, you could go 0.18 mph faster
This is 26 seconds saved over 40 km
At 20 mph:
2.2 Watt savings holding the same speed
At the same power, you could go 0.15 mph faster
This is 33 seconds saved over 40 km
So yes, your numbers match up.
Over an Olympic distance race, we're talking 30 seconds saved from one of the best ways to carry water to one of the worst ways.
I think this is pretty significant.
I hope this helps and sorry to have gotten overly numerical in this. I'm an athlete too and definitely do realize the key of giving the key "decision maker" information with the scientific data. The whole goal of all of the study is to get an answer! I 100% agree that this isn't always well done by the engineers in the industry and hope by accidentally hijacking the thread and talking about CFD didn't turn you off.
And yes, aero bottle on the DT is a pretty sweet solution for short course racing!!!!
Mark
--
Mark Cote
MITAerobike (ST, Twitter)
Specialized Bicycle Components
Road Engineer/Aerodynamicist
Brind-Surch
Nov 6, 09 9:09
Post #57 of 62 (521 views)
Re: Drag differences (watts or seconds per 40k) for different bottle set ups [FiveThirteen]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
I was going to put a bottle in on longer tt but leave it empty for the shorter
Dynamic Du
Nov 6, 09 13:11
Post #58 of 62 (473 views)
Re: Drag differences (watts or seconds per 40k) for different bottle set ups [Andrew Coggan]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To:
In Reply To:
Can anyone transalte 40-50grams of drag into time per 40km and 10-15 grams of drag.
Memorize this (I did):
0.1 lbs (50 g) of drag (at 30 mph) = 0.5 s/km = 5 W = 0.005 m^2 CdA = 0.0005 Crr
The above rule-of-thumb (which refers to changes) is based on various assumptions/rounding everything to a 1 or a 5, but is fairly accurate and hence quite handy when doing in-your-head (or back-of-the-envelope) calculations.
Thanks so much - I've saved it as a notepad file on my hard drive called "Drag". :):)
Dynamic Du
Nov 6, 09 13:12
Post #59 of 62 (472 views)
Re: Drag differences (watts or seconds per 40k) for different bottle set ups [MITaerobike]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To:
Yeah, sorry we got a bit off track there talking about CFD. Great convo though everyone. We'll be talking more about this for sure. My experience is really in wind tunnel testing and I have a lot to learn in the computational world. I had already set up flow conditions for yaw testing as Tom and Chris have suggested. The rotating wheel things are pretty equation and setup depended so we'll need to chat.
Here's some numbers for you (Dynamic Du):
1. Dr. Coggan's conversion numbers are spot on, and based on 30 mph, the speed we usually test at.
2. Using my data of a bare bike versus a DT and ST water bottle or a poorly placed frame bottle increasing CdA by 0.005 CdA or ~40 gF at 30 mph:
At 30 mph:
7.3 Watt savings holding the same speed
At the same power output, this would be a .22 mph increase from 30 mph to 30.22 mph
This is 22 seconds saved over 40 km
At 24.86 mph (40 kph):
4.1 Watt savings holding the same speed
At the same power, you could go 0.18 mph faster
This is 26 seconds saved over 40 km
At 20 mph:
2.2 Watt savings holding the same speed
At the same power, you could go 0.15 mph faster
This is 33 seconds saved over 40 km
So yes, your numbers match up.
Over an Olympic distance race, we're talking 30 seconds saved from one of the best ways to carry water to one of the worst ways.
I think this is pretty significant.
I hope this helps and sorry to have gotten overly numerical in this. I'm an athlete too and definitely do realize the key of giving the key "decision maker" information with the scientific data. The whole goal of all of the study is to get an answer! I 100% agree that this isn't always well done by the engineers in the industry and hope by accidentally hijacking the thread and talking about CFD didn't turn you off.
And yes, aero bottle on the DT is a pretty sweet solution for short course racing!!!!
Mark
Thanks so much Mark. This stuff is gold.
geoffreydean
Jan 13, 10 10:08
Post #60 of 62 (299 views)
Re: Drag differences (watts or seconds per 40k) for different bottle set ups [devashish_paul]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
Do you take fluid with you on the bike for a Olympic distance triathlon?
Geoff from Indy
http://www.chandlervideo.com
http://geoffreydean.wordpress.com/
jackmott
Jan 13, 10 10:11
Post #61 of 62 (296 views)
Re: Drag differences (watts or seconds per 40k) for different bottle set ups [geoffreydean]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
In Reply To:
Do you take fluid with you on the bike for a Olympic distance triathlon?
can't speak for dev, but since it is an event that lasts more than 90 minutes, its generally a good idea to bring one bottle of gatorade or similar on the bike for an oly
----
What is good in life? - To crush your enemie's dreams, see them dropped behind you, and to hear the lamentation of their women!
Sunglasses:
http://www.framesdirect.com/sunglasses
Tri Gear:
http://www.atctrishop.com
Cheap Disc Wheel -
http://www.wheelbuilder.com
Tire Crr Data -
http://www.biketechreview.com
geoffreydean
Jan 13, 10 10:22
Post #62 of 62 (286 views)
Re: Drag differences (watts or seconds per 40k) for different bottle set ups [jackmott]
[
In reply to
]
Can't Post
One bottle of Gatorade on the bike is precisely what I've done for 25 years of Oly distance tri racing; I was just wondering what Dev's take on this is. There seems to be a pendulum swing away from the past recommended amounts of fluid requirements, at least from a pod cast I heard from Joe Friel. Dev seems to be on to this and apparently has had lots of experience - so, Dev?
http://www2.trainingbible.com/...exercise-part-1.html
Geoff from Indy
http://www.chandlervideo.com
http://geoffreydean.wordpress.com/
1
2
3
View All
Print Thread
Are equipment rules important?
What organization's rules do you seek to comply with before you purchase bikes, wetsuits, etc.?
UCI
USA Cycling
UCI/USAC
WTC
USAT
WTC/USAT
ITU
All
None