Slowtwitch.com Main Index MAIN
INDEX
Forum Rules & Legend RULES &
LEGEND
Log in LOG
IN
 
 
 
Search for (options)
Newsletter Signup

Slowtwitch Forums: Lavender Room:
WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him.

 

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All Tri ForumClassifiedsLavender RoomJobsThe Womens


Brian.

Oct 13, 04 12:07

Post #1 of 34 (244 views)
WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. Can't Post

Mass grave unearthed in Iraq

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- U.S. forces have exhumed a mass grave in northwestern Iraq and uncovered the remains of hundreds of people.

Many of the bodies found at the site near al-Hatra are believed to be the bodies of Kurdish women and children thought slaughtered by the Saddam Hussein regime.......

http://www.cnn.com/...aq.graves/index.html

****************************************************

So Hussein wasn't a threat?


YaHey

Oct 13, 04 12:11

Post #2 of 34 (241 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [Brian286] [In reply to] Can't Post

Actually we were better off with Saddam - I'm not saying the Iraqi people were but we certainly were. Also, Saddam is mortal, he wasn't going to last forever. Well, I take it back - look at how long we've let another thorn on our side live (Castro in Cuba).

What happens if the Iraqi justice system lets Saddam go free and he goes back to power? After all, he's not really a POW since we did not declare war.

-------------------------------------


vitus979

Oct 13, 04 12:13

Post #3 of 34 (239 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [Brian286] [In reply to] Can't Post

So Hussein wasn't a threat?

Not to us.







"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."


Brian.

Oct 13, 04 12:13

Post #4 of 34 (239 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [tritnow] [In reply to] Can't Post

I seriously doubt the Iraqi's are going to let him go. Even if he is, I give him 5 minutes max before his head is taken off.


Brian.

Oct 13, 04 12:15

Post #5 of 34 (237 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [vitus979] [In reply to] Can't Post

Your opinion. GWB and Congress felt otherwise.


goobie

Oct 13, 04 12:18

Post #6 of 34 (233 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [Brian286] [In reply to] Can't Post

The article says the people in the graves were killed in 1987, maybe 1988. Remind us all about the climate of the relationship between Iraq and the USA at that time??
------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://pavlov.psyc.queensu.ca/~psyc382/rockgold.html
(Norman Rockwell's "Do Unto Others")


vitus979

Oct 13, 04 12:21

Post #7 of 34 (230 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [Brian286] [In reply to] Can't Post

Your opinion. Backed up by the latest and greatest evidence.

GWB and Congress felt otherwise. And they were evidently mistaken, to put things charitably.

Not only that, but Hussein wasn't even a real threat to the Kurds in recent years. They were running their area fairly self-autonomously before the invasion.

Did you read the part in the Duelfer report about how the threat of chemical weapons proliferation has actually increased since the invasion? Seems the insurgency is pursuing chemical weapons vigorously. So far, they've met but little success. So far.







"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."


Brian.

Oct 13, 04 12:24

Post #8 of 34 (228 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [goobie] [In reply to] Can't Post

How does that justify the killing of women and children?


goobie

Oct 13, 04 12:29

Post #9 of 34 (222 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [Brian286] [In reply to] Can't Post

I know! Especially when the special envoy to Iraq when these things were happening was Donald Rumsfeld, and the US and the UK were giving Saddam money and arms to help in the war against Iran at the same time. It's appalling, isn't it? When will these people be brought to justice?
------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://pavlov.psyc.queensu.ca/~psyc382/rockgold.html
(Norman Rockwell's "Do Unto Others")

(This post was edited by goobie on Oct 13, 04 12:37)


Brian.

Oct 13, 04 12:32

Post #10 of 34 (220 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [vitus979] [In reply to] Can't Post

Backed up by the latest and greatest evidence.

At the time, the evidence pointed elsewhere. We can't play monday morning quarterback on this one.

Not only that, but Hussein wasn't even a real threat to the Kurds in recent years.

So does that justify the 300,000 + people killed under Hussein? Or mass executions?


Brian.

Oct 13, 04 12:34

Post #11 of 34 (219 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [goobie] [In reply to] Can't Post

Your opinion appears to be in the minority.


PeckerHead

Oct 13, 04 12:58

Post #12 of 34 (208 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [Brian286] [In reply to] Can't Post

He was a tyrant but the simple fact is you are desperately stretching for a reason to justify the war.


el fuser

Oct 13, 04 13:03

Post #13 of 34 (201 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [Brian286] [In reply to] Can't Post

>>>We can't play monday morning quarterback on this one.

We can and we MUST. Lest it happens again.


big kahuna

Oct 13, 04 13:19

Post #14 of 34 (192 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [vitus979] [In reply to] Can't Post

Lordy.....here we go again with this one :-)


big kahuna

Oct 13, 04 13:27

Post #15 of 34 (188 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [goobie] [In reply to] Can't Post

I was out in the Gulf in '87 and '88. In '88, I was helping clear Iranians off of abandoned oil rig platforms that they'd occupy and then use as staging platforms to launch sea-based attacks (mostly in small boats and with RPG or .50 cal. machine gun fire) against oil freighters. Our standing orders were to blast any Iraqi naval forces that attempted to get within our exclusion zones. None tried, unfortunately.

In '87, I was near the area where the USS Stark got almost blown in half by an Exocet missile that was air launched by an Iraqi air force plane. They say it was an accident, but I don't think most people out there at the time thought so.

That was one time when all of us wanted to launch a damn missile right at good old Saddam's ass and send him to meet Allah. Geopolitics prevented us from attaining our most fervent wish, though :-(


goobie

Oct 13, 04 13:34

Post #16 of 34 (183 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [big kahuna] [In reply to] Can't Post

Kind of confusing therefore that at the same he was being armed and aided by the US and the UK, isn't it?
------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://pavlov.psyc.queensu.ca/~psyc382/rockgold.html
(Norman Rockwell's "Do Unto Others")


5280

Oct 13, 04 13:47

Post #17 of 34 (176 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [tritnow] [In reply to] Can't Post

Some I Iraqi will kill him:) Which is what we should have done in GW1


Chase Away K9 Cancer


"This sticker is dangerous and inconvenient, but I do love Fig Newtons."

Sponsors:
Me
My wife
My dogs: Gryphon, Alex and Kelley


big kahuna

Oct 13, 04 13:58

Post #18 of 34 (169 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [goobie] [In reply to] Can't Post

I agree. Like I said, the whole geopolitical thing at the time had some of us righteously pissed off.

I know we never liked him, never tolerated his forces anywhere near our task force, and that he caught the Stark with its pants down and unaware until it was too late. Shame on the ship's captain for letting that happen, by the way.

Really, our forces in the Gulf could've taken Iran and Iraq on at the same time out on the water, had we a mind to. Chasing Iranians around out there showed me that.

HMS Sheffield, a British man of war, got hit by the same class of missile earlier in the 80's, during the Falklands War. The Brits and the Yanks play off of the same damage control textbook, but the Sheffield had a majority aluminum structure, which is much more highly susceptible to fire damage than the mainly-steel hull and framing of the American navy's vessels. Sheffield was too badly damaged.

Politics in war. I try to treat it as business, but sometimes it becomes nigh-on impossible.


slowguy

Oct 13, 04 14:10

Post #19 of 34 (165 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [tritnow] [In reply to] Can't Post

"After all, he's not really a POW since we did not declare war.
"

What makes you think this is true?

Slowguy

(insert pithy phrase here...)


vitus979

Oct 13, 04 14:13

Post #20 of 34 (161 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [slowguy] [In reply to] Can't Post

What makes you think this is true?

Is he a POW, commodore? Has he been accorded the treatment due a POW? Will he be freed upon cessation of hostilities? Get real.







"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."


slowguy

Oct 13, 04 14:17

Post #21 of 34 (156 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [vitus979] [In reply to] Can't Post

"Is he a POW, commodore? Has he been accorded the treatment due a POW? Will he be freed upon cessation of hostilities? Get real."

Yes, he was granted POW status. Get real Vitus. He was the military commander of a signatory to the Geneva Conventions during such time as 2 or more parties to the conventions (us and Iraq) were involved in hostilities. No declaration of war is required. His trial will be handled by the Iraqi courts. What didn't we do?

Slowguy

(insert pithy phrase here...)


vitus979

Oct 13, 04 14:20

Post #22 of 34 (155 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [slowguy] [In reply to] Can't Post

Yes, he was granted POW status.

Please provide documentation.







"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."


slowguy

Oct 13, 04 14:24

Post #23 of 34 (153 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [vitus979] [In reply to] Can't Post

"Please provide documentation. "

Here's just a couple links talking about this in case you missed the news.


http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200401/10/eng20040110_132271.shtml

http://www.rediff.com/news/2004/jan/10iraq.htm

http://www.thehilltoponline.com/news/2004/01/16/NationWorld/Hussein.Gets.Pow.Status-582211.shtml

Slowguy

(insert pithy phrase here...)


vitus979

Oct 13, 04 14:26

Post #24 of 34 (151 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [slowguy] [In reply to] Can't Post

I stand corrected.







"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."


big kahuna

Oct 13, 04 14:51

Post #25 of 34 (143 views)
Re: WMD's or not - the world is a better place without him. [vitus979] [In reply to] Can't Post

So...what does everybody think the Iraqi courts are going to do to him? And how soon? They've got the death penalty over there, you know.

Big show trial? Thousands of witnesses? Take him out back and put a bullet through his head?

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All